Complex Molecules and Organs 4 -- Science Disproves Evolution

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

b. Many leading scientists have commented on the staggering complexity of the human eye. What some do not appreciate is how many diverse types of eyes there are, each of which adds to the problem for evolution.

One of the strangest is a multiple-lensed, compound eye found in fossilized worms! [See Donald G. Mikulic et al., �A Silurian Soft-Bodied Biota,� Science, Vol. 228, 10 May 1985, pp. 715�717.]

Another type of eye belonged to some trilobites, a thumb-size, extinct, sea-bottom creature. Evolutionists claim that they were very early forms of life. Trilobite eyes had compound lenses, sophisticated designs for eliminating image distortion (spherical aberration). Only the best cameras and telescopes contain compound lenses. Some trilobite eyes contained 280 lenses, allowing vision in all directions, day and night. [See Richard Fortey and Brian Chatterton, �A Devonian Trilobite with an Eyeshade,� Science, Vol. 301, 19 September 2003, p. 1689.] Trilobite eyes �represent an all-time feat of function optimization.� [Riccardo Levi-Setti, Trilobites, 2nd edition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993), pp. 29�74.] Shawver described trilobite eyes as having �the most sophisticated eye lenses ever produced by nature.� [Lisa J. Shawver, �Trilobite Eyes: An Impressive Feat of Early Evolution,� Science News, Vol. 105, 2 February 1974, p. 72.] Gould admitted that �The eyes of early trilobites, for example, have never been exceeded for complexity or acuity by later arthropods. ... I regard the failure to find a clear �vector of progress� in life�s history as the most puzzling fact of the fossil record.� [Stephen Jay Gould, �The Ediacaran Experiment,� Natural History, Vol. 93, February 1984, pp. 22�23.]

The brittlestar, an animal similar to a 5-arm starfish, has, as part of its skeleton, thousands of eyes, each smaller than the diameter of a human hair. Each eye consists of a calcium carbonate crystal that acts as a compound lens and precisely focuses light on a bundle of nerves. If an arm is lost, a new arm regenerates along with its array of eyes mounted on the upper-back side of the arm. While evolutionists had considered these animals primitive, Sambles admits that �Once again we find that nature foreshadowed our technical developments.� Roy Sambles, �Armed for Light Sensing,� Nature, Vol. 412, 23 August 2001, p. 783. The capabilities of these light-focusing lenses exceed today�s technology.