Re: C�lia's half part of question 2 -- Work Group Four

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

Subject: Re: C�lia's half part of question 2

Author:
Fernanda Pires

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:07:05 08/21/10 Sat
In reply to: Fernanda Pires 's message, "Re: C�lia's half part of question 2" on 12:54:01 08/21/10 Sat

corrigindo justifica��o por justificativa na mensagem q postei anteriormente... sorry...

No segundo estudo (file 2 - �rabes), a justificativa deve ser baseada na passagem abaixo:

Skilled readers are often characterized as more metacognitively aware than less skilled readers. This questionnaire study
of 160 students at a medical university in Bahrain compared reported academic reading strategy use of readers at varying
initial English proficiency level and year of study.

ou seja, a justificativa pelo estudo � q skilled readers s�o caracterizados como mais conscientes "metacognitively"...
��metacognitive� strategies are �carefully
planned techniques to monitor reading� such as previewing and asking yourself questions

bjs

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]