Kodak palm pix review -- DPUG Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: Kodak palm pix review

Author:
Mike Spring

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:20:38 03/27/01 Tue

Regarding Tom Maryon's review of his Palmpix camera, I too recently purchased one at CompUSA (used the Avantgo 10% digital coupon and got it for $95 including tax). I noticed that his images are in pretty sharp focus in the center,if the light is good, but more and more blurry toward the edges. I haven't noticed that phenomenon with mine. I wonder if that is variability in the lenses? I will admit that it is pretty much a snapshot type camera-the Brownie for the 21st century. If you view the image in the original size presented (1:1)by the Kodak Mr. Photo viewer, it has good resolution and the image is about 3X5 inches, but if you try to enlarge it, it gets grainy very quickly. the 2:1 zoom allowed decent closeups, and I was personally impressed with the image quality in relatively low light indoors conditions. If I can determine how to attach the images, I could send some for comparision. How do I do it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]