Re: 九濟堂的未來 -- 九濟堂 SFXC forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sat April 27, 2024 12:21:09

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: 九濟堂的未來

Author:
DB180

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:20:55 12/01/08 Mon
In reply to: 奶路臣 's message, "Re: 九濟堂的未來" on 18:37:42 12/01/08 Mon

>>>何為濟記的興衰?
>>
>>說是聖芳濟書院如何成為濟記
>>再至濟記如何成為聖芳濟英文書院
>
>一日有馮日森
>sfxc只會係一間中文中學

同學，不知你是否對nelson有一點偏見？
不要一股腦兒把責任推到老師身上，學生才是一所學校被界定為CMI中最大的因素。如果你覺得濟記已經成為CMI，請你好好溫習，幫助濟記重回EMI的組別。

再者，難道你認為用英文教CE的maths/a.maths會令學生明白嗎？就算會，你敢擔保一年半內可以教畢嗎？請閣下細心想想。

P.S. 我不是nelson打手。我只是一位被nelson教導跟共事一年多的應屆會考生。我相信，nelson是一位真正有心搞好濟記的好老師。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 九濟堂的未來

Author:
心
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 02:19:28 12/03/08 Wed

真想不到留言又會淪為下俗的人身攻擊。

早年的九濟堂，是反映各濟民 (有誰還記得.....) 心思路向的重要之地。
一般學生，老師，以至家教會成員都會透過九濟堂反映自己的意見，暢所欲言。
就好似沙示時大家都反對學校無理功課量，評論學生會選舉等

我離開濟記數年之久，
不知誰是馮日新 (只知誰是方創新 =p)，更不知各教員的教學方法。
但我知道評價一間學校是否成功，學生質素首當重要。
學生質素在本文有目共睹。

一直以來，九濟堂文化都是濟記學生文化 (質素) 的指示劑。
多謝 "是咁的" 同 "奶路臣" 兩位，你令我和一眾舊生清楚看見了九濟堂的未來。
亦看清楚你地的未來。

堂主大人，在下說得對嗎？ [對不起呢，要迫你現身]