Re: 琴日4E 係咪有成半班人冇上PE 堂??? -- 九濟堂 SFXC forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Fri April 26, 2024 06:05:30

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

Subject: Re: 琴日4E 係咪有成半班人冇上PE 堂???

Author:
水水

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:29:36 12/17/07 Mon
In reply to: 那位仁兄 's message, "Re: 琴日4E 係咪有成半班人冇上PE 堂???" on 16:59:18 12/14/07 Fri

>首先，「言論不得含有侵權，過份的粗口及侮辱性字句」，閣�
>U如此口出髒言，實在有辱閣下是聖芳濟一分子的身分。
>
>其次，人家好好的和人辯駁，論點、論據充足，實在不能說是�
>uxx完一大輪」。而閣下和那位叫「n (班人唔入青山認真浪費
>:()」的人指出甚麼人該入青山，卻沒有充分的理論，只是「說
>完、就收工」，實在是無理取鬧之於極點。
>
>有本事的就以理據來證明「班人唔入青山認真浪費」和「睇黎�
>A比呢班4E更應該入青山」，不過看來，兩位都會不敢出聲，做
>一個畏首畏尾之徒，哼！
同學立場客觀至極，邏輯性極強，惟與其花時間在此白花唇舌，不如溫書好過。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 琴日4E 係咪有成半班人冇上PE 堂???
Author: 那位仁兄 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 17:02:46 12/18/07 Tue 閣下又何嘗不是花時間在此呢？你又不說說自己何以不把上九濟堂的時間來溫書？這個問題實在值得好好深究一番。另外，「謝謝」閣下的「讚賞」。看到閣下的「讚賞」，本人簡直覺得三生有幸，實在不知如何反應是好。