VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3] ]
Subject: Re: Love and Theft Debate


Author:
Sarah Swan
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10:09:08 09/21/07 Fri
In reply to: Andrew P. 's message, "Re: Love and Theft Debate" on 10:06:30 09/21/07 Fri

I concur with Andrew P. Just because a song is catchy doesn't mean it can't be offensive. For example their are plenty of songs out there today that actually do focus on questionable material, but their "catchiness" doesn't negate their poor morals. But yeah, Camptown Races is not racist.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Love and Theft DebateAndrew.N (Antonio farted.)10:22:04 09/21/07 Fri
    Re: Love and Theft DebateBilly W.10:23:53 09/21/07 Fri
    Re: Love and Theft DebateAndrew P.10:24:44 09/21/07 Fri


    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.