Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

Subject: Who do you think will/should come back? Since you can do US as many times as you want, who really should give it another try? Author: ; [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 09:26:30 11/05/07 Mon [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date I would want there to be significant changes made to Mrs US before I would want some of my front runners in there again. I know my faves would be fabulous national queens, but I want them to rep a system that is back on track. I was there as a delegate and think AL, AR, CA, OH, IN, NY, LA, all had a lot to offer. (NT) Hope to see them compete elsewhere. 07:24:47 11/06/07 Tue I have to agree with you on all points. I can't see sending amasing women back to a system that just does not have it's proverbial ducks in a row. I'd personally love to see AR and LA back-IMO they are the true top two (NT) just MY opinion though 08:20:17 11/06/07 Tue oops-shoulg be AMAZING- it is cold here in the NE this morning! (NT) -- oops!, 08:21:32 11/06/07 Tue hee hee hee -I'm out of control SHOULD (NT) -- oh lordy, 08:22:16 11/06/07 Tue Although beautiful, I don't think they were the whole package. (NT) -- Let's not start with them again!, 16:03:07 12/08/07 Sat If you don't want to "start that" then don't bump this up from the bottom with some nasty comment. I happen to think that AR and LA were the entire whole amazing package. There were members of the top ten this year that were a JOKE. The whole package this year is certainly not what they were looking for. Too bad. (NT) -- IMO, 09:10:38 12/10/07 Mon Many of the delegates who would be INCREDIBLE, gracious, and deserving titleholders dealt with a system this year that has them heading quickly to other systems. That explains why you will see only a couple of delegates return this year to US and why you will find so many competing in International and even America. (NT) Hard lesson. 07:05:24 01/31/08 Thu Many of these women have already competed at American and can't go back. They felt rained on at U.S. New crop of intellegent ,gorgeous women coming through! Trust me the system is not suffering. In fact numbers are high in many States. Glad to see fresh faces and ladies with a new attitude towards pageantry! (NT) -- Refreshing (Lovin it!), 17:45:33 02/05/08 Tue I am thrilled to see some of these delegates competing again. I have only heard of one person going back to US at this point. She will rep DC this time around. Some will be at International and others are waiting to give America a try when their prelims roll around. Some are still keeping it top secret right now, but it will be fun to see who will be competing in the various systems. They deserve a chance to shine and a good time. (NT) \~**~/ 09:57:15 02/04/08 Mon New day in Pageantry! Happy to see these ladies move along... (NT) -- no name, 12:00:20 02/06/08 Wed You mean move forward. On to bigger and better (NT) -- ~, 20:22:43 02/07/08 Thu Sorry, move along, is just what I meant! (NT) -- no name, 22:13:35 02/10/08 Sun The letter sent to Isabella was posted on 214108. Sour Grapes? I think not. (NT) They did a good job. 18:19:50 02/11/08 Mon MODERATOR PLEASE DON'T ALLOW PEOPLE TO USE THIS AS A TOOL TO SABATOUGE! (NT) -- no name, 13:01:02 02/13/08 Wed Get over it! onlooker 11:40:47 02/13/08 Wed Thank You! This whole thing is beyond rediculous! They have sent their letter and got a repsponse. What more do they want or expect. They continue to hash over an issue that is as we speak is being dealt with. Show me a pageant that is perfect! This is just pure sabatouge! But guess what! It's not working. In fact the numbers are growing because women are seeing the true picture of what this pageant represents. Mrs. United States winners are out there making change in there communities. And that's what it is truely about. If you want to make judgement on the pageant itself, go ahead. If production is all that matters in the bottom line. But if you are wanting a pageant experience where you can make a difference. Look at what our women are out ther doing! Then judge. Mrs. United States is a symbol that is bigger than any one individual! (NT) -- More than 15 minutes of fame! (Research what these women do!), 12:50:39 02/13/08 Wed You're funny. If you read any of those responses, you will find the people on the letter aren't the only ones who see MAJOR issues. So numbers are better? Really? Who is telling you that? Is that is why so many more states are at-large this year and some directors have now backed out? What does that say? No pageant is perfect, but come on. (NT) Just wondering 13:33:14 02/13/08 Wed No, your funny, because you are on the outside looking in. (NT) -- no name, 20:39:13 02/13/08 Wed