Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5] ]

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Thank you to whoever it was that defended me -- AJ, 12:11:22 03/01/08 Sat [1]

I was bringing out some facts about the war. Yes, I did notice it wasn't challenged. But I was told to grow up? It's rememberable when the person attacks another person who tells the truth. But goes on and on how he is fair. Then let others tell the truth about how the war started since he wants to cover up..zippppppp......... I mean forget about certain key elements.

I also confess, I DID notice Obama gets picked on about nothing. Obama doesn't throw eggs at Mc Cain and Mc Cain doesn't throw eggs at Obama. They both throw them at Clinton, rightfully so. She's getting her come-uppins.
Yet, it's already discussed that Obama will say something nasty about Mc Cain. Like he knows the person. That isn't fair or being bias. Neither men threw the race card at each other. And they both respect each other. But a (certain someone) has to find fault with him because he is a "D". For a certain someone to have so many African American friends, I wouldn't piss them off like he is doing in A.C. right now. They may not tell him, but they are talking among themselves. A double standard is there.
One other thing.. someone(s) has a problem with women having their own show.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Dave you didn't answer the questions about Rumsfield -- OK, here's the truth...., 23:20:07 03/01/08 Sat [1]

>
>>Democrats started 1) the Korean war 2) The Vietnam war
>>3) the Serbian war.
>And it was the Republicans who made money off of it
>and didn't try to stop it did they?
>

Only Republicans made money? Where's your proof? And Eisenhower stopped the Korean war, Nixon stopped the Vietnam war, and Clinton let the Serbian war end because he didn't need to distract America anymore from Monica....


>>I think it's about even.
>Which tell you about those people....
>

What?

>>George Bush protected this country by fighting the
>>terrorists over there, not on our shores. Remember, no
>>more attacks after 9/11.
>
>And gave different versions why HE started the war.
>Explain why he let Bin's family get away? It was Us
>plane who got the towers. Look at the video. None of
>those planes had insignia of where they come from. How
>do you explain there was NO BODIES over the penn.
>crash site? There are always bodys from a crash site.
>You cannot stop any "nut" from bombing. They can just
>strap it on and walk anyywhere and kill people. You
>cannot stop and idea. Some people are crazy. So if it
>stopped all of a sudden that means it was planed by
>the US as other countries say it was.
>

Now I see you're a real wacko. A 9-11 conspiracy is the most ridiculous thing anyone can imagine. So there's no sense even talking about anything else. If you believe that, you are certifiably insane.

>>And if Iran keeps developing nuclear weapons, whoever
>>is president is going to have to put a stop to it,
>>whether it's Obama or McCain.
>What about Korea? You didn't answer that question. Why
>haven't they gone there? Because they have no oil. And
>there are other countries that have them as well. PLUS
>BUSH is friens with Saudi Arabia.. hummmmmmmmm
>You didn't address Rumsfield and the other stuff.
>Would like to forget it eh?
>>War isn't a political thing. It's a necessity to
>>protect our country and our interests.
>It IS a political thing. Everyone knows that. Even the
>people in Washington say so. Plus I cannot understand
>why Harry keeps nick picking on Obama. If someone did
>that to his idol and god Bush he would have a fit. He
>can't find nothing on him so he picks on him about
>stuff that means nothing. He is doing to Obama like
>New York Times is doing to Mc Cain. At least be happy
>he is beating Clinton. Leave the man alone and have a
>clean race against him and Mc Cain.
>


>Grow up and
>>don't be a coward.
>AJ never called you names. Why did you resort to that
>statement? Because you were reminded you about the
>past which you keep forgetting on purpose? I notice
>when your caught and another person, you resort to
>name calling. That isn't very mature. Lets stick to
>the facts.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> I have to back him up too. Some question were skipped over.. -- no name, 06:31:34 03/02/08 Sun [1]

Wow, I have to defend AJ also. This guy still didn't talk about how the war kept changing or what happened in the reagan years with saddam and rumsfield. He keep doing round and round on other issues with no proof and calling names. Why are you calling him names?

>Only Republicans made money? Where's your proof? And
>Eisenhower stopped the Korean war, Nixon stopped the
>Vietnam war, and Clinton let the Serbian war end
>because he didn't need to distract America anymore
>from Monica....

They made money with the helicopers and the armerment(sp?)That is on record.
But you didn't speak of Reagan, how he cheated on his wife and messed up his children. A hollywood actor. Or Rudy and his 4 wives. It goes both ways. If Rudy got in, who would know what secrets he would tell a prositute or another woman? That man has no self control.

>>>George Bush protected this country by fighting the
>>>terrorists over there, not on our shores. Remember,
>no
>>>more attacks after 9/11.
Really? Do you think that can stop any nut who wants to do it? Have you forgotten Tim Mc Vey?

>
>Now I see you're a real wacko. A 9-11 conspiracy is
>the most ridiculous thing anyone can imagine. So
>there's no sense even talking about anything else. If
>you believe that, you are certifiably insane.

Explain why he let Bin family fly out of the country? When someone catches you, you call them names. And I saw the towers like everyone else did. The place DIDN'T have any insignia. Plus when those guys made a video with the fireman, the firemen talked about bombs exploding in the towers like c-4 going off. They won't play that again on the air either. Check it out for yourself. You just refuse to believe the truth. Bin Laden's family was flown out of the USA. That is a fact. Look at what USA did to the poor soldiers at Pearl Harbor? It's about money. Always about money.

>>>And if Iran keeps developing nuclear weapons, whoever
>>>is president is going to have to put a stop to it,
>>>whether it's Obama or McCain.
>>What about Korea? You didn't answer that question. Why
>>haven't they gone there? Because they have no oil. And
>>there are other countries that have them as well. PLUS
>>BUSH is friens with Saudi Arabia.. hummmmmmmmm
>>You didn't address Rumsfield and the other stuff.
>>Would like to forget it eh?
>>>War isn't a political thing. It's a necessity to
>>>protect our country and our interests.
>>It IS a political thing. Everyone knows that. Even the
>>people in Washington say so. Plus I cannot understand
>>why Harry keeps nick picking on Obama. If someone did
>>that to his idol and god Bush he would have a fit. He
>>can't find nothing on him so he picks on him about
>>stuff that means nothing. He is doing to Obama like
>>New York Times is doing to Mc Cain. At least be happy
>>he is beating Clinton. Leave the man alone and have a
>>clean race against him and Mc Cain.
>>name calling. That isn't very mature. Lets stick to
>>the facts.

He didn't answer these questions either. About korea or Saudi Arabia. Because it's true. Please don't call people names if you don't want to answer factual questions. If you don't want to answer it then don't but just because you get caught don't go backward and resort to name calling. That's not nice.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: I have to back him up too. Some question were skipped over.. -- The real truth, 09:10:07 03/02/08 Sun [1]

Anyone who doubts terrorists caused 9/11 is a certified nutcase and doesn't deserve a response. They are literally insane.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> still calling names? -- No name, 14:00:43 03/02/08 Sun [1]

It's something that a few people have a closed mind. But still won't answer the questions put before him. But rather call names and won't look at the pictures. Look at the frames... you can see the planes were plain!!!
Then again you won't answer about rumsfield, or Reagan's misconduct with his wife or any other question. Just call names. Your truth machine has blown up and be prepared because as long as you keep picking on people for things athat are small, you WILL be called out.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: still calling names? -- No, not at all...., 15:58:42 03/02/08 Sun [1]

Just looking at who I'm arguing with. When you try to refute the truth about 9/11, you demonstrate what a loony figure you really are and that you are not worthy of further discussion. And I will not respond to you in the future.

Call me out all that you want, but sensible people dismiss you.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> He always resort to calling names when he is caught in a lie -- CHW, 09:46:23 03/03/08 Mon [1]


a
>loony figure you really
Looney? You didn't answer AJ question about Saddam or how the war kept changing or the looks of the plane when it came in at the tower.
At first I thought this person is wrong.I was ready to back YOU up until you statred this name calling.
Then I popped in the old VCR and guess what? There is no TWA, or spirit airline or american airline on the plane in any angle!!!!!!!!! Now I have to check myself...
Calling people looney is name calling my friend. That is a lie you told.
You didn't answer many of AJ questions; that is two. I remember myself Reagan hiring Saddam and giving him arms. I remember all the different reasons for going to war. And if the USA can really stop people from blowing themselves and buildings up, why haven't they stopped it overseas? We are asking questions here and you keep spewing out looney and crazy and kook. That is name calling. Can you stick to the facts?
I keep going back to my VCR..

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: He always resort to calling names when he is caught in a lie -- Here's the truth..., 15:11:53 03/03/08 Mon [1]

Anyone who doubts 9/11 isn't sane. Here's the truth. I don't answer questions from loonies....


http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: He always resort to calling names when he is caught in a lie -- No that's your true, 03:57:29 03/05/08 Wed [1]

http://loosechange.com

[ Edit | View ]