Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>On full-length resized ammo, "head space" measurement >is almost irrelevant, (unless your firearm has a >headspace issue, or you believe the dies being used to >resize this brass may be worn out of tolerance). SAMMI >specifies die tolerances, and a full length-sizing die >typically returns brass to "minimum chamber size". If >factory ammo has no headspace issues in your rifle, >full length resized ammo (from a die within SAMMI >speck) shouldn’t either. (Different factory dies size >differently but all within the "TOLERANCE" specified.) >Buy and READ "Hatcher’s Notebook" by Julian S. >Hatcher, published by Stackpole Books, to learn that >there is excessive misinformation and needless >concerns about "Headspace" in properly assembled (or >manufactured) fire arms. IN SHORT, properly resized >brass will function no differently than NEW brass. > >(Are you questioning the machinery, technique, or >skill of the folks here?) > > > >I asked the question awhile ago. Now I'll ask again in >>a different way. Has anyone who has received rifle >>brass .223/5.56 .308/7.62 checked the brass for proper >>head space with a precision mic or a Wilson cartrige >>case gage? And what did you find? I have not yet seen >>a post mentioning this or anyone asking this question. >>If you are a reloader this is important. This is the >>only question that so far has kept me from ordering. I >>think it a great thing to knock off most of the work >>involved in processing brass. Not trim length but head >>space. BTW congrats on the DOD reversal. Dean

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.