VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sunday, March 09, 06:34:30pm
Author: Kristen Fassbender
Subject: Re: LBJ
In reply to: Margaret Huey 's message, "Re: LBJ" on Saturday, March 08, 12:31:12pm

I think Margaret makes some very good points, especially when she discusses the terrain. The enemy fighters know the dense jungles and can use them as an advantage and kill many US soldiers. An increase in troops would only increase the targets and the death toll. His plan was doomed to fail because he does not mention any new methods of fighting, and that was really the thing needed.

PS: Marc, I think you misinterpretted Margaret's use of "most likely." She was just saying that the reason for failure was most likely what she went on to say.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.