Judging instructions are specific and posted on the website. -- The Prediction Board of online pageantry!

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:21:48 01/11/12 Wed
Author: Not too hard to read.
Subject: Judging instructions are specific and posted on the website.
In reply to: 's message, "I thought the paperwork said total package." on 12:37:19 01/11/12 Wed

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> But it"s been said that CJ will not be using circuit judges. A crying baby has been known to win at small face pageants. But, I've never seen a crying child win a national pageant. -- No name, 16:04:53 01/11/12 Wed [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> That's the difference between experienced judges and non-experienced. -- No name, 16:05:44 01/11/12 Wed [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Maybe. Or maybe it was unclear judging instructions or no training for judges. Last year's judges at CJ did just fine - winners were all beautiful girls and they all met criteria in judging instructions. -- No name, 21:22:02 01/11/12 Wed [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> And I've seen name girls have a horridly off day and still win because the judges know how they "normally" do. -- No name, 16:36:55 01/11/12 Wed [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> The paperwork I read said total package with a gorgeous face and yet this is now turning into a face pageant. Regretting this one already, facial beauty is so subjective and is shaped a lot by that judges particular upbringing. I would rather see total package with a cute/pretty face. -- No name, 14:40:34 01/13/12 Fri [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> The judging instructions have been up from day one. Where the word total package was used was in one sentence that said something like "total package beautiful from head to toe." Someone was bashing on the boards about it and CR came on and said something like point taken, and removed the two words from the sentence. It has never included modeling and the judges instructions have not changed. It is very clear what it is being judged on. No other pageant even posts their judging instructions so you don't know what the hell they are judging on. -- No name, 19:01:00 01/13/12 Fri [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> All judging is subjective and based on that judge's opinion, in any pageant. -- No name, 19:03:09 01/13/12 Fri [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> It did not have modeling included I'm scoring -- No name, 19:11:18 01/13/12 Fri [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]