Current GOP crooks vs. Ancient Dem probs -- Copake Politics and News

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:55:38 05/19/09 Tue
Author: Cody Hill
Subject:

Current GOP crooks vs. Ancient Dem probs
In reply to: 's message, "Re: Justice Prevails!" on 18:48:09 05/19/09 Tue

"Plenty of demoncrats that are perverts too. Look them up yourself. There is enough dirt on both sides, both repugs and dem suck."

Ok, as an objective individual I can understand the difference from ALLEGATIONS and the real deal. It's most unfortunate you, seemingly, cannot.

You can't even spell former President Clinton's name correct, so there is no need to get into the details of breaking a marriage vow not rising to the level of those GOP lawmakers mentioned above.

The president who presided over seven years of economic prosperity was never convicted of any crime within the U.S. Senate (no charge got a majority vote much less two-thirds) after a Billion dollar investigation and a political trial by Republican House members who wished to feel relevant and garner news headlines.

You even failed to mention the more recent Gov. Elliot Spitzer peccadillos, so there is no doubt you were not serious by including Clinton on your copy and paste list.

In addition, I certainly hope you noticed I did not offer former Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) as another GOP gone wrong, since it turns out he did not commit a crime while in public office. I wish you had took the time to research your list compiled by some right-wing political hack.

Your hack even goes way back to the mid-70s! Should I have included Nixon and all the president's men involved in Watergate? I think that's quite a stretch and offers little as far as the origional point I was trying to make.

The Rep. Mills scandal is from 1974

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilbur_Mills

Rep. Hays, from Watergate era: 1976

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayne_Hays

John Andrew Young, same thing: 1977

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Andrew_Young

AllenHowe, 1976... suspended sentence

http://www.media.utah.edu/UHE/h/HOWE,ALLEN.html

Fred Richmond, 1978 charges

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Richmond

Gerry Studds, 1983 censure

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Studds

Republican Daniel B. Crane was also involved in the 1983 page sex scandal. You "forgot" him.

Sen. Brock Adams never convicted of a crime, but decided no 2nd term

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brock_Adams

Jim Bates

As I mentioned earlier, Duke Cunningham lost his seat due to his bribery and other criminal offenses. Bates should've campaigned harder to stop Cunningham from getting into office, but that is not a convictable offense.

Getting tired of proving you incorrect, so that's it for me.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Current GOP crooks vs. Ancient Dem probs -- No name, 19:04:20 05/20/09 Wed
- Re: Mr. Yanni -- Cody Hill, 20:56:56 05/20/09 Wed