Re: Friends - this is exactly what I mean ... -- Copake Politics and News

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:58:09 03/15/09 Sun
Author: No name
Subject: Re: Friends - this is exactly what I mean ...
In reply to: Ned Depew 's message, "Friends - this is exactly what I mean ..." on 14:35:35 03/15/09 Sun

>"squiddy" is one of the cowardly, ignorant, anonymous
>trolls (CAITs) from the Hudson board.
>
>This sort of silly lie - coupled with gratuitous
>insults, vicious personal attacks and mis-information
>- is the kind of thing with which he/she and others of
>his/her ilk have plastered the Hudson Board, largely
>driving out intelligent, substantive discussion of
>important issues.
>
>If you want to verify my posts, you can always do so
>by e-mailing me at the address supplied (just leave
>out the "n0*spam" part) or looking my number up in the
>phonebook.
>
>If you have a trusted moderator, another alternative
>is to set up the board so that posters must sign names
>and provide e-mail addresses with the moderator, but
>can still post without signing their real names. That
>allows them to maintain "public" anonymity, but still
>allows the moderator some measure of control and the
>ability to hold posters accountable.
>
>But if you allow unrestricted anonymity, this is
>exactly the kind of time-wasting, foolish nonsense you
>invite.

Mr. Depew,
I believe the moderator already said this is forum provides for anonymous posting.
You have twice posted your displeasure for this. Why don't you just let it go. This is not your forum.
You are however free to go start your own.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Word to the wise on Ned Depew -- squiddy, 08:00:02 03/17/09 Tue