Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ] |
| Subject: text for analysis | |
|
Author: Júnia |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 15:57:17 10/02/09 Fri In reply to: Júnia 's message, "Re: Instructions for the Morphology Online Seminar" on 15:53:04 10/02/09 Fri >Source: >href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/arts/design/02g >roup.html?_r=1&ref=arts">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10 >/02/arts/design/02group.html?_r=1&ref=arts > > >Activist Energy With a Light Touch > >Known to many New Yorkers primarily for art >exhibitions, Asia Society is a grander entity than its >Park Avenue galleries might suggest. According to its >press materials, the institution’s overarching mission >is to “promote understanding among the people, leaders >and institutions of Asia and the United States” and to >generate new ideas in “the fields of policy, business, >education, arts and culture.” >Are those fields listed in order of importance? If so, >it might explain why the work in the society’s surveys >of new art, like the current “Hanging Fire: >Contemporary Art From Pakistan,” tends so often to be >topical in content, market ready in format and >didactic in delivery. > >One of the first of the society’s big one-country >shows, “Inside Out: New Chinese Art” in 1998, sold >itself on the notion that the most significant work >emerging from China was all by brash, young, >implicitly democracy-loving rebels in thrall to the >Western media and eager to break with their own >cultural past. This profile was meant to win Western >hearts, and it did. That many artists still produced >ink-and-brush landscapes and calligraphy and were >subtly but radically updating these traditions was >barely acknowledged. > >In 2005, “Edge of Desire: Recent Art in India” focused >heavily on art that addressed current social issues >like sectarian violence and the effects of a global >market economy. Not represented was a range of new >abstract or near-abstract art and sculpture from South >Asia that doesn’t necessarily look “Indian” and that >is personal, and only incidentally political, in >content. > >This exhibition of new art from Pakistan, with its >references to war, religion and consumerism, largely >conforms to the Asia Society model, except for its >size. The Chinese show had more than 60 artists, the >Indian survey more than 40. Both were spread over two >New York City spaces. “Hanging Fire” has 15 artists >and takes up just two Asia Society galleries, one very >modest in scale. > >So it doesn’t pretend to be a survey. It’s a closely >edited group show drawn from a small pool of artists, >most of whom attended the National College of Arts in >Lahore. Given these restrictions, it’s surprising that >the show has the variety it does. > >Lahore had been a cultural hub for centuries by the >time Pakistan was separated from India in 1947, and it >has remained so. After partition, the National College >of Arts was forged from an existing colonial >institution, and schools were also established in >other cities. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| Analysis | Cristiane | 18:21:07 10/02/09 Fri |
|
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |