| Subject: Re: Supremacy or Superiority? |
Author:
Joanie
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 16:02:51 02/09/14 Sun
In reply to:
bim
's message, "Re: Supremacy or Superiority?" on 00:14:48 09/08/10 Wed
Bim, you stated it perfectly! Though there may be difference I sexes, neither is superior over the other as each is a compliment to the other, doing that which the other cannot and I am not saying that either sex can not. Only that some because of their sex will not.
>rather that sexes complement each other. I also
>believe in the importance of roles.
>
>The physical differences does not indicate superiority
>but complementation. Another complementation is that
>women are better incentives, while men are better
>initiatives. This may not necessarily be genetic but
>rather social; i don't know; but most of the
>differences are nurtured.
>
>Most people are neither pure doms nor pure subs. Most
>people are doms sometimes or in some aspects, and subs
>otherwise. That is most people are switches, and this
>is an essential aspect to understand about humans.
>
>Most female-led relations that are successful are
>those where there is separations of roles. He might be
>sub to her in some things, while maybe dominant in his
>job. This conforms with the "switch" nature of most
>people. Most other female-led relations that do not
>take this into account fail. Even the dominant wives
>themselves become uninterested and seek cuckolding, or
>other dominant partners.
>
>Being submissive is not something wrong to be ashmed
>of. This is an essential part of the self freedom.
>Nobody is a real dom if he/she is not free. He/she
>must be free to live the submissive side as well as
>the dominant side. Most dominant women, honestly
>speaking, fear to admit before men their submissive
>side. Most also do not have sexual freedom. I have
>never seen a woman who picks one or two men at a bar
>for sex.
>
>I promote femdom from my belief in indifferences and
>androgyny (but i need to point at the failures).
>
>bim
>
>
>>Personally, I don't see one gender as wholly superior
>>or inferior to the other.
>>Each gender has its strengths and weaknesses. Males
>>are genetically designed to be the more physical
>>gender. You'd have to go and change our species to
>>alter this. (yes, there are exceptions, but that's
>>what they are - exceptions - not the norm).
>>While males are predisposed to physical labor, females
>>are better suited to decision making roles.
>>If you just look at female lead marriages, those are
>>the ones where both partners are happiest, there's
>>less conflict, and thus, the family as a whole is
>>better off.
>>Men who serve their wives or girlfriends are happier
>>than those that don't have that opportunity.
>>Unfortunately, most men are too stupid to realize this
>>and are unwilling to accept a female lead. Women can
>>make their mates happy if they would just take the
>>lead and steer the relationship in that direction
>>(either overtly or covertly).
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 