Why not a scientific theory? -- Ben's Message Board

Saturday, December 06, 10:29:55pm [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Why not a scientific theory?

Author:
Wade A. Tisthammer
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10/ 9/04 6:46pm
In reply to: Damoclese 's message, "Is it?" on 09/28/04 2:28pm

>We have to ask ourselves how well ID meets the
>criteria to be a scientific theory, and we find it
>doesn't do a very good job because it fails to meet
>any of the stringent requirements that a scientific
>theory has to mandatorily accomodate.

That depends on what philosophy of science you're using, but I'm interested in the details. Exactly why isn't ID a scientific theory?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Things I'd consider Damoclese 10/ 9/04 8:12pm

Scientific theory or good scientific theory? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 10/16/04 3:12pm

Comments -- Damoclese, 10/16/04 5:44pm

My comments -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 10/31/04 2:44pm