Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, May 12, 10:49:43pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Choose ye this day to which thread thou shalt respond Author: Ben [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 09/20/06 6:34pm In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "Looking at some of the points" on 09/19/06 5:09pm >The thread was about the "copycat" claim so I'm going >to stick with this. Strange... you didn't want to discuss the first page I offered, so I offered a second site which seemed to be more mainstream which offered some of the same ideas. Once I did that, you went back and argued against the site that you before didn't think was worth the time. What changed? Surely the original site hasn't changed in the last few days. I don't really have much time to discuss such things these days either, nor do I have the motivation. I thought the original site was at least interesting. Often, I find that something emotionally charged will get people writing a little more than something that respects all positions. Not that I enjoy writing that way, but when I find a site like that, it does seem to make people take notice and argue their point a little more. You chose instead to focus on what you perceived as my inadequacy... "Just wondering, when the top of the web page had (in great big letters) "MARCH OF THE TITANS - A HISTORY OF THE WHITE RACE" didn't that tip you off as a bit suspicious regarding the issue of white supremacy?" "Put two and two together Ben." In reality, I really didn't notice the title. I just started reading some of the stuff, skimming at first, until it started to be more interesting. Although I do have the ability to add two and two, I did not notice the bias that this web site had. Once I did post a different page, you went back to the first one, so maybe you're a bit hard to please. Ben [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date An explanation Wade A. Tisthammer 09/21/06 6:02pm Keepin' it real -- Ben, 09/24/06 1:52pm Real thought -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/25/06 1:22pm Some things...never change -- Damoclese, 09/25/06 6:31pm Read more carefully everyone -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/25/06 11:20pm Careful reading does not yield agreeing -- Damoclese, 09/26/06 12:22am Fine, but you should still read more carefully. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/26/06 10:23am Write specifically -- Damoclese, 09/26/06 3:07pm ...and read carefully -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/26/06 5:06pm Believe what you will -- Damoclese, 09/26/06 11:07pm Many people change their view at times -- QUITTNER, 09/27/06 12:53pm True enough -- Damoclese, 09/28/06 5:34pm Ditto -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/29/06 10:52am