In the argument -- Ben's Message Board

Thursday, April 09, 07:02:20pm [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: In the argument

Author:
Damoclese
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 03/13/04 7:29pm
In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "'round and 'round we go..." on 03/13/04 4:26pm

>>The infinite past. So, the argument does assume there
>>is a thing called the infinite past, and makes
>>assumptions about what that might be/entail?
>
>No.

Yes.

>See above. The assumptions, if they exist, have to be
>somewhere! Now where are they?

You're a smart boy, I'm sure you'll figure it out.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

I can do that too. Wade A. Tisthammer 03/13/04 10:17pm

But not as well -- Damoclese, 03/14/04 8:11am

Where are the assumptions? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/15/04 12:23pm

Confession of much apathy -- Damoclese, 03/15/04 5:29pm

If you're apathetic about this, why have you continued so far? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/18/04 9:55am