ID theory -- Ben's Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, May 19, 05:20:00am

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: ID theory

Author:
Tumelo

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09/27/04 5:39pm
In reply to: Duane 's message, "Here's side issue we could dicsuss..." on 09/17/04 5:24am

I just finished reading what Duane had to say about the seeming reluctance of certain people to come up with a straight answer to the question about who/what this Intelligent Designer Is, I tend to agree with him on the Issue that most people who accept certain aspects of the argument for Evolution, and then question the theory when It seems to suggest that life as we know It, seems to have arisen and achieved complexity all on It's own.

It's very strange I tell you, they'll read books of all sorts that basically hammer home the same point over and over and over again, that all systems have a tendency to move from a simple state to a complex state, all organizations that I've heard about have all had that tendency, and unless I've been looking somewhere else, they still are, friend "Behe" would be wise not only to give a plausible reason for his continued support for a theory as outlandish as ID, or at the least to provide details we can all put to the test, as to his claims about an "ID", he might not succeed at proving his belief, but at least he would have tried to bring us all Into the loop.

But as things stand now, he doesn't seem to be Interested In anouncing who and/or what form this ID would take.

Tumelo

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Yeah - see my last post to Wade...	Duane	09/29/04 2:59am

ALL systems?	Wade A. Tisthammer	10/ 3/04 12:16pm
Actually... -- Duane, 10/ 3/04 11:02pm Factually -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 10/ 9/04 3:48pm