Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Saturday, May 10, 06:54:16pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Invalid Author: Baz [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 03/ 4/04 1:49am In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "Logically absurd" on 02/13/04 11:56am Wade, I have not read all the arguments, but this is nonsense. There is a big difference between deduction and reality. If one of the conditions within an argument is impossible then the reasoning becomes invalid. There is one assumption you have omitted to consider which invalidates your conclusion, and that is the assumption that an individual can exist for an infinite length of time. The infinite existence of the vehicle of your argument is not theoretical, it is impossible, and as your reasoning includes an impossibility your conclusions are void. Baz [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Invalid? Where? Wade A. Tisthammer 03/ 5/04 11:51am Fallacious thinking. -- Baz, 03/ 5/04 8:39pm And........ -- Baz, 03/ 7/04 4:56pm I missed yesterday!!!! -- Damoclese, 03/ 7/04 5:11pm Oh yeah? Where? Which premise? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/12/04 10:48am I give up! -- Baz, 03/12/04 12:12pm Why? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/12/04 12:54pm Actually -- Damoclese, 03/12/04 3:27pm Factually -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/12/04 3:39pm This. -- Damoclese, 03/12/04 4:18pm That. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/13/04 1:38pm Premise pogo -- Damoclese, 03/13/04 1:51pm Don't pogo around the premises, pick one! -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/13/04 2:23pm twister -- Damoclese, 03/13/04 3:01pm 'round and 'round we go... -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/13/04 4:26pm In the argument -- Damoclese, 03/13/04 7:29pm I can do that too. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/13/04 10:17pm But not as well -- Damoclese, 03/14/04 8:11am Where are the assumptions? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/15/04 12:23pm Confession of much apathy -- Damoclese, 03/15/04 5:29pm If you're apathetic about this, why have you continued so far? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/18/04 9:55am Oh. That's all it is? -- Duane, 08/12/04 5:10am