VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:23:24 10/05/20 Mon
Author: louis
Subject: Re: Anyone Want To Talk About Girdles
In reply to: JP from NoVA 's message, "Re: Anyone Want To Talk About Girdles" on 17:14:12 10/04/20 Sun

A lot of the faja companies are doubling and even tripling their fabrics. Some offer 4 grades of compression. Even latex. Do check out leonisa.com.


>>JP that was really fascinating. I obviously made the
>>wrong assumption. So from what you say it would seem
>>that girdles from the early 1960`s would`ve contained
>>a lot more spandex - about 30% if not more. I recall
>>women often wore these girdles then which as you say
>>were a lot heavier and more controlling - especially
>>with the downstretch satin paneling. I think they
>>were also of a very high quality and the workmanship
>>was second to none. Probably why they could be so
>>attractive. In a way it is a great pity that one can`t
>>get these original fabrics anymore. There is a cmany
>>called Spandex Inc. It would be interesting perhaps to
>>ask them about these fabrics. I know they sell a heavy
>>and extra heavy powernet/spandex but I`m not sure what
>>it consists of.
>
>Hi Nick!
>
>Yes, I think the combination of considerably heavier
>fabric, higher spandex content
>and sizes cut smaller all contributed to that "body
>armor" feeling.
>I wonder if anybody at that company would be able to
>quote what the typical denier the 60's powernet used
>in girdles was,
>and if anything similar is still available.
>
>Workmanship was better on just about everything in the
>60s.
>
>They certainly did design girdles to be pretty back
>then.
>
>It was fascinating how they would work in so many
>non-stretch panels,
>and then criss-cross multiple layers of powernet to
>produce unique patterns.
>The tulip and double diamond girdles had some areas
>that had 4 and 5 layers of powernet overlapping.
>
>Remember how the department stores used to put the
>girdles onto clear mannequins,
>and light up the inside of the mannequin, so everybody
>could see how many power panels the girdle had,
>and how concentrated some of the areas of overlap
>were.
>
>For some reason, they always had these mannequins
>upside down, with legs pointing straight up in the
>air.
>Sometimes, the legs were also covered with hose.
>
>As a youngster, I was fascinated with these
>mannequins.
>It certainly was no mystery to me what ladies wore for
>underwear.
>
>Then I discovered the wonderful world of mail order
>catalogs! :)
>Cheers,
>JP

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.