VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:25:52 07/26/12 Thu
Author: IMRD
Subject: July 25, 2012 news

http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Opinion&title=Read-his-lips-on-the-RH-bill&id=55690

Read his lips on the RH bill


Core
Benjamin E. Diokno

Is President Aquino for or against the Reproductive Health (RH) bill? Why can’t he make a bold, clear, and categorical statement in support of the RH bill considering that reforms in population management play a crucial role in his plan for a strong, sustained and inclusive growth for the Philippine economy?
RELATED STORIES


Core -- Benjamin E. Diokno: "Easier said than done"

Core -- Benjamin E. Diokno: "Risks of complacency"

Core -- Benjamin E. Diokno: "Stop borrowing from abroad!"

Core -- Benjamin E. Diokno: "Shadowy funds still lurk"

Core -- By Benjamin E. Diokno: "Private construction -- robust or bust?"

In his third State of the Nation Address (SONA), coming after a litany of backlogs in inputs in the education sector -- classrooms, desks, textbooks, teachers (?) -- that he hopes to address this year, Mr. Aquino said: “Perhaps, responsible parenthood can help address this.”
Perhaps? And why can’t he even mention the Reproductive Health bill, as if it is an unwelcome word? It’s the RH bill, not the Responsible Parenthood bill, Mr. President. And there’s a big difference between the two.
RH LAW MEANS LESS FISCAL WOES
Mr. Aquino should know that the RH Bill, if it becomes a law, will help solve a lot of his -- and his successors’ -- fiscal woes. All of a sudden, budget deficits will become manageable, the likelihood of an investment upgrade improved, more funds will be freed up for much needed public infrastructure, and growth will be sustainable as the poor will rely less on the thinning forests for their sources of energy.
If RH bill becomes a law, less public funds will be needed to support the revenue-draining conditional cash transfer (CCT) program. It will mean giving conditional cash assistance to a few million less poor Filipinos.
If the RH bill becomes a law, less public funds will be needed to support the P297.7 billion -- and rising -- budget for basic education. There will be a few million less Filipinos to educate. And with fewer students, there will be less need for teachers, classrooms, desks, textbooks, and other educational inputs. The quality of instructions will improve under more pleasant physical environment.
If the RH bill becomes a law, less public funds will be needed to support universal health care. Maternal mortality rate will be reduced drastically.
And with better education and improved health care, labor productivity will increase, incomes will improve and poverty reduced and hopefully totally eradicated. It would be a really bright day for the Philippines when that day comes when the CCT program is no longer necessary.
If the population becomes more manageable, less will be spent on education, health, social safety nets such as the CCT program, public housing, peace and order and so on. Public funds will then be freed for essential public infrastructure which the economy badly needs in order to grow more vigorously and on a sustained manner.
With the current Congress in its final year, the need to pass the RH bill has reached a critical phase. Postponing it for next year, after a new Congress is voted into office, and with the current President on the second half of his term, is tantamount to inaction. If it is more difficult to approve the RH bill now, I find no reason why it would be easier to pass it after a new Congress is convened.
I find it incredulous that the population issue continues to be debated passionately in this country. This issue has long been dead and laid to rest in developed and most developing economies, including historically Catholic nations.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF RH BILL
The benefits of the RH bill are well-known and supported by facts and figures. Below is the summary of these benefits, based on an updated paper* written by a group of professors from the UP School of Economics.
First, the experience from across Asia indicates that population policy cum government-funded family planning program has been a critical complement to sound economic policy and poverty reduction.
Second, at the micro level, family size is closely associated with poverty incidence, as consistently borne out by household survey data over time. Poor families are heavily burdened when they end up with more children than they want. The larger the family size, the higher the poverty incidence; this relationship has not changed over the last 24 years.
Third, the poor prefer smaller families, except that they are unable to achieve their preference. The poorer the household, the higher the “unwanted” number of children.
Fourth, the lack of access to contraception has important health implications. Maternal mortality rate already high at 162 per 100,000 live births [Family Health Survey (FHS) 2006] has risen further to 221 (FHS 2011). As a result, it is highly unlikely to fall to the Millennium Development Goal target of 52 by 2015.
Fifth, the health risks associated with mistimed, unwanted pregnancies are higher for adolescent mothers, as they are more likely to have complications during labor.
Sixth, there are unintended social costs (negative externalities) arising from mistimed and unplanned pregnancies. Parents who are able to space their children and achieve their desired number are also more likely to bear the full cost of raising and educating them. By contrast, poor families having more children than desired are constrained to rely more on public education and health services and other publicly provided goods and services.
Seventh, ensuring access to the full range of modern (“artificial”) FP methods-cum-appropriate information raises the success rate of achieving the desired family size. Limiting FP options to “natural family planning (NFP) methods only” fails to address the private and social costs of mistimed and unwanted pregnancies. NFP methods typically have 24% failure rates, meaning that if 100 women adopt NFP, 24 of them would typically become pregnant in a year.
All these fiscal and economic benefits from the RH bill will not happen overnight. But they will surely change, for the better, the country’s fiscal outlook, its people’s welfare, and the environment in the long run.
Responsible leadership means looking at the future, rather than the next elections. It means making hard decisions and actions, if such acts would improve the welfare of the greatest number of people.
*An updated and shortened version of an earlier paper first issued in August 2008 and reissued in February 2011. It also partly derives from an older paper titled “Population and Poverty: the Real Score” (December 2004), prepared largely by the same UP professors.
Benjamin Diokno is professor of Economics at the School of Economics, University of the Philippines (Diliman). He was formerly secretary of budget and management in the Estrada Cabinet and undersecretary for budget operations in the Aquino 1 administration.


http://www.malaya.com.ph/index.php/news/nation/9280-bishops-gang-up-on-aquino-repro-health-backers-rejoice

Bishops gang up on Aquino; repro health backers rejoice
•
•
Details
Published on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 00:00
Written by GERARD NAVAL
By A Web design Company

View Comments
LIPA Archbishop Ramon Arguelles yesterday said President Aquino’s endorsement of the reproductive health/responsible parenthood bill is a virtual imposition of the “death sentence” on Filipinos, especially the unborn.
“We in the pro-life movement are so disgusted with these vigorous pronouncements in support of responsible parenthood aka RH bill,” said Arguelles. “This is a big boost for the ungodly world order. It is the death sentence for the Filipino people.”
The Philippine Legislators Committee on Population and Development Foundation Inc. said Aquino’s endorsement should prompt lawmakers to put the measure to a vote.
“The President’s endorsement of responsible parenthood in his SONA is a strong message for our legislators to act on the life-saving measure which has been pending in Congress for 11 years,” said PLCPD executive director Rom Dongeto.
Dongeto said the measure is needed to address the worsening problems on maternal mortality and teenage pregnancy.
Aquino, during the State of the Nation Address Monday, said the problem of shortages in the education sector could remain as student population continues to increase. “Perhaps responsible parenthood (bill) can help address this,” he said.
Sorsogon Bishop Arturo Bastes said Aquino’s endorsement is a virtual declaration of “war” against the pro-life stance of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines.
“His quick remark regarding responsible parenthood is a bad omen for what the Catholic Church stands for… PNoy is undermining the moral force of the Catholic Church,” he said.
Malolos Bishop Jose Oliveros said the statement is in contrast with Aquino’s declaration that the people are his “bosses.”
“Now, he is imposing on the Filipino people his own stand on the RH bill. He should listen to the voice of the majority of our people, who are Catholics as expressed by our bishops, who are shepherds of the flock,” said Oliveros.
Aquino, CBCP president Archbishop Jose Palma and Palace and Church officials met last Friday in Malacañang but the RH bill was not discussed, said Msgr. Joselito Asis, CBCP secretary general.
“The bishops were invited by the President. It was just a simple dinner. We also had a tour in Malacañang,” said Asis.
He said the dinner had long been planned, way back in early April, but was finalized only earlier this month.
“It was just a friendly chat. For me, it’s opening the door for a good dialogue or collaboration (in the future),” he said.
With Palma were Bastes, San Fernando auxiliary Bishop Pablo Virgilio David, Antipolo auxiliary Bishop Franciso de Leon, Surigao del Norte Bishop Antonieto Cabajog, and Kabankalan Bishop Patricio Buzon.
Among the government officials present were Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa Jr., Health Secretary Enrique Ona, and Social Welfare Secretary Corazon Soliman.
The CBCP has been staunchly opposing the RH bill which is calls anti-life because it promotes the use of artificial contraceptives like condoms.
Dongeto noted a report of the Family Health Survey that maternal mortality rose to 221 deaths out of 100,000 live births in 2011 from 162 per 100,000 live births in 2006, and a report of the United Nation’s Population Fund that 53 births per 1,000 women are from ages 15-19.
Deputy presidential spokeswoman Abigail Valte said Aquino in his SONA “gently reminded” lawmakers that the measure has yet to be passed.
Valte said Aquino’s stand has not changed, and it is allowing couples to decide on how to plan their families.
Valte said Aquino made the same “gentle reminder” for other pending bills including the “sin” taxes bill and amendment of the Anti-Money Laundering Act. – With Jocelyn Montemayor

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.