Check the two deep -- Colgate Sports

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Replies:

[> Re: Check the two deep -- Gate Raider, 09/24/15 10:47:36am Thu

Checked it. What am I missing?

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Check the two deep -- maven, 09/24/15 11:03:41am Thu

>Checked it. What am I missing?

I think they are listing a starter who may or may not start...

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Check the two deep -- The Future, 09/24/15 12:08:09pm Thu

Maven knows things.

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Check the two deep -- Gate Raider, 09/24/15 1:50:16pm Thu

I'll speculate. Perhaps Hunt is going with Mooney but, I don't think that would be a good for the first conference game. I might look to a different DB to start. Saw some pretty bad missed tackles last week.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Check the two deep -- agatefan, 09/24/15 1:54:41pm Thu

>I'll speculate. Perhaps Hunt is going with Mooney
>but, I don't think that would be a good for the first
>conference game. I might look to a different DB to
>start. Saw some pretty bad missed tackles last week.

a change or 2 at LB wouldn't hurt either 37 & 38 are solid, after that...not so much

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Check the two deep -- Gate, 09/24/15 9:50:30pm Thu

A different DB, guys aren't suppose to get past the DL, really. How about let's score some points on offense. Can't win a game if you can't score. All the way around there needs to be some changes.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Check the two deep -- agatefan, 09/24/15 10:02:11pm Thu

>A different DB, guys aren't suppose to get past the
>DL, really. How about let's score some points on
>offense. Can't win a game if you can't score. All the
>way around there needs to be some changes.

DL should "occupy" OL and LB's should clean up and only 2 have been doing that the other 2 have not!

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Check the two deep -- get em ' gate, 09/25/15 8:15:34am Fri

>A different DB, guys aren't suppose to get past the
>DL, really. How about let's score some points on
>offense. Can't win a game if you can't score. All the
>way around there needs to be some changes.

Gate's running attack is ok but that is not how you score points, establish field position and win games.Team has receivers who can make get the job done. Just get them the ball.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Check the two deep -- Gate Raider, 09/25/15 8:10:55pm Fri

There is more than one way to score, get field position and win. When J. Branch, J. Scott, and Nate Eachus were at 'gate, they got field position by running the ball for 1st down after 1st down and ending with a TD. By doing so they also used up huge amounts of the clock. Wins resulted. Nothing against passing but, you can't live by that alone.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Check the two deep -- The Future, 09/26/15 12:05:54am Sat

Maven's not going to be this cryptic about a DB.

I would agree that field position is helped by being in the other team's end zone

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Check the two deep -- Maven, 09/26/15 9:35:15am Sat

>Maven's not going to be this cryptic about a DB.
>
>I would agree that field position is helped by being
>in the other team's end zone

We get a dub back today.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Check the two deep -- The Future, 09/26/15 9:46:35am Sat

Shows what I know.

But great to get #1 back. (I'm assuming.)

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Check the two deep -- Gate63, 09/26/15 9:50:22am Sat

>Shows what I know.
>
>But great to get #1 back. (I'm assuming.)

Solid assumption. Confirmed by Nikko Armiento's weekly email update.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Check the two deep -- analyzer, 09/26/15 10:49:39am Sat

It is no longer the 60s and 70s. Defense wins championships, but we need to pass effectively to loosen up the running lanes, otherwise it is 7-8 in the box and run failure.

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Check the two deep -- pigskin, 09/26/15 11:13:44am Sat

The kicking game could win us some tilts, but with the blocked field goals lately, we can't even count on that. Not that it was Bowman's fault; gotta get better along the OL at keeping the opposition from getting to his kicks.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Check the two deep -- Gate Raider, 09/26/15 7:00:39pm Sat

Those blocked kicks were blocked on the D side of the line. The kicks were blocked because they were two low. Bowman will get it right.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Check the two deep -- Maven, 09/26/15 8:10:58pm Sat

>Those blocked kicks were blocked on the D side of the
>line. The kicks were blocked because they were two
>low. Bowman will get it right.

Bowman hooked his extra points today and does not look confident. Don't look for FG attempts until he gets it together.

[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.