In journalism, the Five Ws, Five Ws and one H, or the Six Ws, -- FEC

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:01:40 07/26/12 Thu
Author: last modified on 21 July 2012 at 18:36.
Subject: In journalism, the Five Ws, Five Ws and one H, or the Six Ws,

Five WsFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
In journalism, the Five Ws, Five Ws and one H, or the Six Ws,

is a concept in news style, research, and in police investigations that are regarded as basics in information-gathering.[1] It is a formula for getting the complete story on a subject.[2] The maxim of the Five Ws is that for a report to be considered complete it must answer a checklist of five questions, each of which comprises an interrogative word:[3]
Who is it about?
What happened?
When did it take place?
Where did it take place?
Why did it happen?
The principle underlying the maxim is that each question should elicit a factual answer — facts necessary to include for a report to be considered complete.[4] Importantly, none of these questions can be answered with a simple "yes" or "no".

Some authors add a sixth question, “how”, to the list, though "how" can also be covered by "what", "where", or "when".[3]

In British education, the Five Ws are used in Key Stage 3 (age 11-14) lessons.[5]

[edit] HistoryThis section focuses on the history of the series of questions as a way of formulating or analyzing rhetorical questions, and not the theory of circumstances in general.[6]

The rhetor Hermagoras of Temnos, as quoted in pseudo-Augustine's De Rhetorica[7] defined seven "circumstances" (μόρια περιστάσεως 'elements of circumstance'[8]) as the loci of an issue:

Quis, quid, quando, ubi, cur, quem ad modum, quibus adminiculis.[9][10]
(Who, what, when, where, why, in what way, by what means)
Cicero had a similar concept of circumstances, but though Thomas Aquinas attributes the questions to Cicero, they do not appear in his writings. Similarly, Quintilian discussed loci argumentorum, but did not put them in the form of questions.[9]

Victorinus explained Cicero's system of circumstances by putting them into correspondence with Hermagoras's questions:[9]

Julius Victor also lists circumstances as questions.[9]

Boethius "made the seven circumstances fundamental to the arts of prosecution and defense":

Quis, quid, cur, quomodo, ubi, quando, quibus auxiliis.[9]
(Who, what, why, how, where, when, with what)
The question form was taken up again in the 12th century by Thierry de Chartres and John of Salisbury.[9]

To administer suitable penance to sinners, the 21st canon of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) enjoined confessors to investigate both sins and the circumstances of the sins. The question form was popular for guiding confessors, and it appeared in several different forms:[11]

Quis, quid, ubi, per quos, quoties, cur, quomodo, quando.[12]
Quis, quid, ubi, quibus auxiliis, cur, quomodo, quando.[13]
Quis, quid, ubi, cum quo, quotiens, cur, quomodo, quando.[14]
Quid, quis, ubi, quibus auxiliis, cur, quomodo, quando.[15]
Quid, ubi, quare, quantum, conditio, quomodo, quando: adiuncto quoties.[16]
The method of questions was also used for the systematic exegesis of a text.[17]

Later, Thomas Wilson wrote in English verse:

Who, what, and where, by what helpe, and by whose:
Why, how, and when, doe many things disclose.[18]

In 19th century America, Prof. William Cleaver Wilkinson popularized the "Three Ws" – What? Why? What of it? – as a method of bible study in the 1880s, though he did not claim originality. This became the "Five Ws", though the application was rather different from that in journalism:

"What? Why? What of it?" is a plan of study of alliterative methods for the teacher emphasized by Professor W.C. Wilkinson not as original with himself but as of venerable authority. "It is, in fact," he says, "an almost immemorial orator's analysis. First the facts, next the proof of the facts, then the consequences of the facts. This analysis has often been expanded into one known as "The Five Ws:" "When? Where? Whom? What? Why?" Hereby attention is called, in the study of any lesson: to the date of its incidents; to their place or locality; to the person speaking or spoken to, or to the persons introduced, in the narrative; to the incidents or statements of the text; and, finally, to the applications and uses of the lesson teachings.[19]

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
The Elephant's Child
The "Five Ws" (and one H) were memorialized by Rudyard Kipling in his "Just So Stories" (1902), in which a poem accompanying the tale of "The Elephant's Child" opens with:

I keep six honest serving-men
(They taught me all I knew);
Their names are What and Why and When
And How and Where and Who.

By 1917, the "Five Ws" were being taught in high-school journalism classes,[20] and by 1940, the "Five Ws" were being characterized as old-fashioned and fallacious:

The old-fashioned lead of the five Ws and the H, crystallized largely by Pulitzer's "new journalism" and sanctified by the schools, is widely giving way to the much more supple and interesting feature lead, even on straight news stories.[21]

All of you know about — and I hope all of you admit the fallacy of — the doctrine of the five Ws in the first sentence of the newspaper story.[22]

[edit] References^ "Knowing What's What and What's Not: The Five Ws (and 1 "H") of Cyberspace". Media Awareness Network. http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/resources/special_initiatives/wa_resources/wa_shared/tipsheets/5Ws_of_cyberspace.cfm. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
^ [1] Journalism website. Press release: getting the facts straight. Work by Owen Spencer-Thomas, D.Litt. URL retrieved 24 February 2012.
^ a b "The Five Ws of Online Help". by Geoff Hart, TECHWR-L. http://www.geoff-hart.com/articles/2002/fivew.htm. Retrieved April 30, 2012.
^ "Five More Ws for Good Journalism". Copy Editing, InlandPress. http://inlandpress.org/articles/2001/01/19/best%20practices%20for%20newspapers/20010119-archive1.prt. Retrieved September 12, 2008.
^ "The Five Ws of Drama". Times Educational Supplement. 4 Sep 2008. http://www.tes.co.uk/teaching-resource/The-Five-W-s-of-Drama-6001931/. Retrieved 10 mar 2011.
^ For which, see e.g. Rita Copeland, Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and Translation in the Middle Ages: Academic Traditions and Vernacular Texts, 1995. ISBN 0-521-48365-4, p. 66ff as well as Robertson
^ Though attributed to Augustine of Hippo, modern scholarship considers the authorship doubtful, and calls him pseudo-Augustine: Edwin Carawan, "What the Laws have Prejudged: Παραγραφή and Early Issue Theory" in Cecil W. Wooten, George Alexander Kennedy, eds., The orator in action and theory in Greece and Rome, 2001. ISBN 90-04-12213-3, p. 36.
^ W. Vollgraff, "Observations sur le sixieme discours d'Antiphon" Mnemosyne IV:1:4 (1948), p. 266 at JSTOR
^ a b c d e f D. W. Robertson, Jr., "A Note on the Classical Origin of 'Circumstances' in the Medieval Confessional", Studies in Philology 43:1:6-14 (January 1946). at JSTOR.
^ Robertson, quoting Halm's edition of De rhetorica; Hermagoras's original does not survive
^ Citations below taken from Robertson and not independently checked.
^ Mansi, Concilium Trevirense Provinciale (1227), Mansi, Concilia, XXIII, c. 29.
^ Constitutions of Alexander de Stavenby (1237) Wilkins, I:645; also quoted in Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologica I-II, 7, 3.
^ Robert de Sorbon, De Confessione, MBP XXV:354
^ Peter Quinel, Summula, Wilkins, II:165
^ S. Petrus Coelestinus, Opuscula, MBP XXV:828
^ Richard N. Soulen, R. Kendall Soulen, Handbook of Biblical Criticism, (Louisville, 2001, ISBN 0-664-22314-1) s.v. Locus, p. 107; Hartmut Schröder, Subject-Oriented Texts, p. 176ff
^ Thomas Wilson, The Arte of Rhetorique Book I. full text
^ Henry Clay Trumbull, Teaching and Teachers, Philadelphia, 1888, p. 120 text at Google Books
^ Leon Nelson Flint, Newspaper Writing in High Schools, Containing an Outline for the Use of Teachers, University of Kansas, 1917, p. 47 at Google Books
^ Frank Luther Mott, "Trends in Newspaper Content", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 219 (January 1942), pp. 60-65 at JSTOR
^ Philip F. Griffin, "The Correlation of English and Journalism" The English Journal 38:4 (April 1949), pp. 192 at JSTOR
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Five_Ws&oldid=503470782"
Categories: ReportingResearchProblem solvingEnglish phrasesInterrogative words and phrases
Personal toolsCreate account Log in NamespacesArticle Talk VariantsViewsRead Edit View history ActionsSearch NavigationMain page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia InteractionHelp About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact Wikipedia ToolboxWhat links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Cite this page Print/exportCreate a bookDownload as PDFPrintable versionLanguagesDeutsch Español Français 한국어 Italiano עברית Magyar Nederlands 日本語 தமிழ் తెలుగు Türkçe 中文 This page was last modified on 21 July 2012 at 18:36.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of use for details.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Contact us
Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Mobile view

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]