| Subject: Re: Two Answers and One Question |
Author:
Bob E.
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 02:27:08 09/28/12 Fri
In reply to:
Russ
's message, "Two Answers and One Question" on 18:38:04 09/27/12 Thu
No, Russ, I completely agree (and stated myself) that any thin clothing will have negligible cushioning effect of whatever spanking method that's used. In the Behavior Contracts that we had our kids sign, we specified the bare-bottom method of spanking, in order to achieve a consistency across all spankings, and to assure ourselves that we were not "overspanking," i.e., bruising, God forbid. But, we realized that there might be a modesty issue that would present itself at puberty, if my wife were to spank the boys. To "head this issue off in advance," my wife chose an age of ten for allowing the boys to cover with underwear, or pajama bottoms.
In view of the fact that the boys have no qualms about joining me in the sauna, and are not embarrassed when I have encountered them getting dressed, etc., I did not feel that they would care about their bottom being bare for spanking when I spank them. At this point, if they were to raise any objection, I would not hesitate to allow them to cover themselves as they do for my wife. I do suppose there may be some psychological effect of a bared bottom, but it is not one that I need nor really consider as significant.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|
Feedback: 