VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:05:27 07/14/13 Sun
Author: Joe Rizoli (Another Jewish pro illegal)
Author Host/IP: 146.115.156.139
Subject: Adam Steiner nutjob
In reply to: Joe Rizoli 's message, "Kevin Gatlin nutjob" on 09:49:24 07/14/13 Sun

Another nutjob but for a different reason. He seems to be Jewish so that explains his dementia for wanting to help illegal Immigrants in their saty in the USA. His opinions here are totally Jewish because the Jews have ruined the Immigration laws in the USA and continue to do so.
America got rid of the stigma "Jew" for Immigration quotas for acceptance in the USA so that eventually brought the flood gates of Communist and other bad boys from Israel and Russia.
Adams Steiners comments like I said are the typical Jewish comments we have to fight here in America. Of course bring the Illegals in but just don't put them living next to any Jews.


From: Adam Steiner
Date: 8:13pm, May 02

Speaking as a member of the 49 who voted against this measure, I am very
disappointed with Town Meeting. I think that this resolution is mean spirited
and unfairly targets one group of residents for a political point. I would have
made the following argument, but was not recognized to speak before the
question was moved.

Town Meeting is asking that undocumented immigrants be blocked from this
program and this is a poor idea for a number of reasons. First, our country is
moving in the direction of recognizing and accepting undocumented immigrants.
Whether you agree with this idea or not, it is reality and it is in our best
interest that these individuals learn English. We should be looking for
creative ways to help bring Framingham together rather than going out of our
way to exclude one group to the benefit of another.

Second, this measure asks to create a single limitation or litmus test for
participation, immigration status. There are many undocumented immigrants who
live and work in Framingham, pay sales tax, hotel and meals tax, and real
estate taxes as an embedded component of rent. Some even pay excess income tax,
when it is withheld from a standard paycheck, but cannot file income taxes to
recover some of it in the form of a refund. In general, undocumented immigrants
have a net positive impact on the U.S. economy and this cannot be denied no
matter how many posts referencing questionable sources one makes.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/magazine/do-illegal-immigrants-actually-hurt-the-us-economy.html?pagewanted=all

Further, why limit only based on this one attribute? Am I to believe that the
supporters of this measure have no problem with convicted felons, sex
offendors, and tax deadbeats taking English classes but that undocument
immigrants are not worthy? Aren't there horrible, intolerant U.S. citizens in
Framingham as sure as there are kind, responsible undocumented immigrants, some
of who were brought here as children and have grown up in our community and
contributed to the value of the town every step of the way. Among members of
town meeting, there is not a single one who has recently broken a traffic law,
filed a tax return with a little fuzzy math, or otherwise skirted U.S. law? Are
we that perfect that we can bring collective judgement on a large group of
people without a drop of reservation?

Third, this program should not expend a single minute or dollar verifying
immigration status because every dollar spent there is another taken away from
actual instruction. The organizers of this program have not been clamoring for
an additional administrative responsibility for a reason.

Supporters of this resolution say that undocumented immigrants are taking away
spots from legal immigrants who like to enroll. On this I agree, a change
should be made - and it is simple. I ask the leaders of the program to notify
members of town meeting the dollar amount required to erase the waiting list
and allow for full participation. Then we as a Town Meeting should appropriate
this amount. Problem solved and without a spirit of exclusion and negativity.
▼ Rest of post
--Adam Steiner
Town Meeting Member, Precinct 4

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/framgov/messages/topic/3ECpQfHjcV0FX42Pt1PvcN

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.