Re: Saying NA weren't the first -- BURIAL GROUND DESECRATIONS,ETC.

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:57:57 07/17/01 Tue
Author: Nick
Subject: Re: Saying NA weren't the first
In reply to: ADV Reporter 's message, "Saying NA weren't the first" on 09:13:35 04/09/01 Mon

I just stumbled onto this article while surfing the web. I can'y believe those idiot scientists classified the skeleton as "native American". Of coarse it's native American. Why couldn't it be? Oh, wait, wait...genetic testing already proved that it was Caucasin!! What a bunch of morons! That one stone with the Nordic runes all over it was dicovered a few years back (maybe decades, i don't remember) somwhere in the US, and it was established that Vikings had been here a long time ago. I agree witht he Asatru Folk Assembly, it's a Scandanavian ancestor, plain and simple. The skeleton should be given to the AFA.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]