VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:23:15 10/26/01 Fri
Author: trencher
Subject: Same experience here
In reply to: Rob 's message, "Re: Respectfully disagree" on 16:12:04 10/24/01 Wed

I have found as many others here that more flexibility as related to CG means more spinning/rotation of shoulders, hips, hands, plus a longer backswing and narrower stance.

How can you read the above statement and tell me 'that' will be more consistant. It's hard enough this way :-)

Not to be disrespectful of the above poster(Jack) but that is like saying a longer club with more moving parts (softer shaft) will be more controllable.....but then, I don't know Jack.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.