VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:13:45 01/19/02 Sat
Author: Edward Laskody
Subject: Re: A genuine fake
In reply to: Tim 's message, "A genuine fake" on 19:40:20 01/19/02 Sat

>You are as fake a $3 bill. You posted even as
>Golfnut4. That is dishonest. JK's LPG is a seriously
>flawed swing concept. No cocking of the wrists is
>absurd, as is the need to put a device on your arm to
>prevent a natural release of the club. The burden of
>proof for LPG is on JK, not on others. He must prove
>that it works, not the other way around. Moe Norman
>proves that Natural Golf works. LPG has no such proof.
>There are no great LPG ballstrikers. It is a flawed
>method in my own humble unsolicited damn opinion.

My name is gulfnut, gulfnut4 is not a name I would use if I wanted to post under another name. There are thousands of names I could choose; why would I want to choose one that is close to one everyone knows is mine.
I went back and rewrote the message in the 1st person as oppossed to the third. This does not change the message one bit. You people focus on every damn thing but the issue involved. What about what the message says. Does it praise me and say what a great guy I am or does it just try to expleain my position.
You appaarently dont understand the nature of scientific statements. When Kuykendall made that statement it means that anyone can go out repeat the "experiment" and get the same results. To date, many people have.
When statements about cold fusion were made, the claimant didn't have to "prove" it, his experiments already did that. Now it is up to the skeptics to go out and see if Kuykendall is telling the truth. Thus far no one has discovered otherwise, ie, the experiment has been verified over and over again. You if anyone should know that Kuykendall has many enemies, don't you think that if that statement he made was false, they would never let him forget it.
Sorry, NG is the second best swing now at best. That is just the way it is and you have to get out of that state of denial that you are in.
Ed L

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.