VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:55:51 03/22/01 Thu
Author: natty-golfer
Subject: Re: Gee Natty, no comment on the bogus patent usage??
In reply to: Chazman 's message, "Re: Gee Natty, no comment on the bogus patent usage??" on 10:39:49 03/22/01 Thu

>I supposed fraudulent advertising is alright in your
>book?

i've read enough of your posts to know that you have no solid proof. There's lots of fraudulent ads out there in golf, but if they (NG)want to "patent" their clubs, one way or the other, I don't care. I like the SYSTEM, the swing, it works for me, and thats all I'm really worried about. I wouldn't own their overpriced clubs regardless of a "patent," I'm not paying that much.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.