Re: ISBAL, Please answer this question?? -- America East Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:32:44 04/17/03 Thu
Author: czar
Subject: Re: ISBAL, Please answer this question??
In reply to: lsbal 's message, "Re: ISBAL, Please answer this question??" on 22:56:57 04/17/03 Thu

>>Baker is a back-up at best! He just handled the ball and got his team in to the offense. Chatman has some talent! Hartford only has one left? Did they sign Watson who is a major academic risk? I love Stys! Leave him at the point! Him and Parker are the glue! They will miss Johnson's low post scoring. Lowndes, Bosley, and Zmincas are not low post scorers! Lang just wants to shoot 3's! They can use Watson. He is not skilled but powerful and athletic!

Why would Harrison sign Baker and Chatman??? Neither
>>is a starting caliber AE pg. Chatman is better but
>>two pg's in the same class?
>
>Chatman is not signed.It was premature reporting by
>Boston Hoops. Hartford is supposed to bring in "a
>couple" of PG's though.Currently they have no PG's on
>the roster besides Baker. As the year evolved last
>year Cook became the starting 2G and Stys(they like
>Stys better at the 2).Swan also plays the 2. Stys
>might be forced into playing the PG slot this year but
>they want more diversity.
>
>You have obviously seen both of them play to
>say..."neither is a starting caliber AE pg". I have
>seen neither play. Therefore I have to believe that
>the staff feels they know what they are doing.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]