Re: Stats -- America East Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:26:08 04/20/03 Sun
Author: Ramfan
Subject: Re: Stats
In reply to: czar 's message, "Re: Stats" on 21:34:50 04/20/03 Sun

He was THIRD team all-MAAC. Which just as easily could have been a token spot for a Loyola player. You're getting your panties in a bundle over a third team All-MAAC player. Nice accolade. Doesn't neccessarily mean all that much. The MAAC is a better conference than the America East, but you're acting like the kid was All-Conference in the Big East, for Christ sakes.

>>Are you really a complete moron or just trying to
>portray one. Jordan was ALl MAAC. MAAC is much
>better then the AE. Obviously the coaches in the
>league thought he was a Top 15 player in the MAAC.
>Look at his frosh stats went Loyola was playing normal
>basketball and not the slow down crap!
>
>
> Jordan this past season-- 40% from the field, 30%
>>from three, less than a 1 to 1 assist to turnover
>>ratio. He'll help, no doubt. But the All-America East
>>predictions are way premature.
>>
>>
>>
>>> You don't have to agree with me, but I believe, in
>>>principle, that we are talking about similar
>>>situations. Jackette wasn't likely going to put up
>big
>>>numbers, but it seemed like he was going to have a
>>>bigger impact. That never really happened. Then along
>>>came Flores, and his role decreased. Still, he could
>>>have earned more playing time alongside Flores and
>>>Greene had he been more consistent. Even as a senior,
>>>I thought he was too foul-prone and inconsistent to
>be
>>>really effective.
>>>
>>> Again, this is about hyperbole, and while you seem
>>>more reasonable than the Czar, there is too much
>>>hyping of Albany players on this board. I don't buy
>>>it. Again, Jordan is a nice pick-up, but I believe
>his
>>>numbers were inflated by playing on a 300+ RPI team.
>>>
>>> Flores is a nice player, but again, this is the
>>>MAAC, not the Big East. He probably would have had a
>>>decent career in the Big East had he stayed at
>>>Rutgers, but went to a lesser conference, and put up
>>>big numbers. A nice player, but he also took a lot of
>>>shots and was their focal point on offense. It would
>>>have been interesting to see him in the Big East,
>>>because his flaws would have been magnified. One of
>>>the best in the East? Maybe, but not of the caliber
>of
>>>a Hatten or a Troy Bell.
>>>
>>>
>>>>I totally disagree but I respect your opinion. As a
>>>>soph eligibility wise Jackette avg. 11.5 and started
>>>>26 games. Along comes Flores at the same size 6'2"
>>>>from the Big East and down goes Jackette's role.
>>Still
>>>>has been a captain for past 2 seasons with numerous
>>>>health issues.
>>>>Any good 6'2" would have their numbers chopped up if
>>a
>>>>player of Flores magnitude was brought in, Twice a
>>1st
>>>>Team All Conference player. Don't be to thick headed
>>>>to realize that. I feel Jackettes situation is
>>unique,
>>>>his numbers weren't due to his lack of ability it
>was
>>>>due to one of the best players in the "East" coming
>>in
>>>>and taking over.
>>>>Rationalize all you want but I have to respectfully
>>>>disagree with your logic.
>>>>
>>>>> I know �

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]