[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]
Subject: A Big Thank You

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:38:02 05/03/19 Fri
In reply to: Danielle 's message, "A Big Thank You" on 05:09:40 05/03/19 Fri

Simple answer to that question would be fear of litigation. They would have to be able to back up what they're saying in a legal sense, and that might not be as easy as it sounds. Not being able to prove their allegations could mean a defamation case victory for The Wife, even if they are telling the truth.

When Buddy was killed, he didn't have a will. All property belonging to Buddy would have automatically been bequeathed to The Wife, as she was his next of kin at the time. Bill Griggs stated this quite a few years back in one of the documentaries produced around the time of the fortieth anniversary of the plane crash. I can't remember if it was in the VH1 special, or "The Final Day". All she had to do was register his name and likeness as her intellectual property, and presto! Instant cash cow.

Regarding the lies, I think these were certainly perpetuated by the movie released in 1978. It was the perfect platform for her to be given an audience, and wheel out the fertiliser wagon. With nobody willing to refute her claims, they are put on record as fact. It's only through researchers such as Bill Griggs; John Beecher; John Goldrosen; Roddy; Graham; Ryan Vandagriff, and Kevin Terry putting their work into print that we're finally able to separate the wheat from the chaff. I am sure we're only just starting to see the tip of the iceberg when it comes to this woman.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.