Re: Site Statistics just suck... -- The DeVry School of Evil Geniuses Alumni Assoc.

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: Re: Site Statistics just suck...

Author:
JIM

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:49:40 05/14/01 Mon
In reply to: ~Steve-o 's message, "Re: Site Statistics just suck..." on 20:56:23 05/10/01 Thu

>>Relax? RELAX!!
>
>%@#^%$!! I have Franky Goes to Hollywood stuck in my
>head now. Thank you very f#%@!in much.

I can't relax! Cause I'm a Boingerrrr...

[selective editing]
>>>Speaking of which, have you noticed how impossible it
>>>is to get listed on Yahoo! ?
>
>>It takes time. Heck, when I submitted my site to
>>Yahoo! back in 1995 (it's since been removed because
>>the server got dropped) it took a few months for it to
>>show up, and this was when folks had no idea what the
>>web was.
>
>I submitted Ford in September when I started it.

I submitted HG shortly after it started in Jan. 2000.
I got an email on Saturday saying that it was now listed. I had looong since given up on that, and I was surprsied as hell.

>>Ah, heck, the truth to the matter is that I'm doing
>>this pretty much for my own evil reasons and not for
>>overwhelming publicity. Strike that.
>
>Of course strike it. You write 'em cause you like to.
>That doesn't mean you don't want other people to like
>'em too.

Wot he said.

>>We all have our crosses. JIM is an egomaniac, you're a
>>tad paranoid
>
>What do you mean by that?!

Can we get back to talking about me now?

>>and I'm manic.

Actually, add us together, we'd make a great super-villain...

>>Actually, I'm glad that I've not been
>>cloned yet. Mostly because I'd make a horrible 80's
>>detective.
>
>Visor sunglasses and a Flock of Seagulls haircut?

Moccasins and no socks?

JIM

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Site Statistics just suck...	~Steve-o	17:38:35 05/14/01 Mon
Re: Site Statistics just suck... -- TechnoAtheist, 21:22:32 05/14/01 Mon