VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:24:03 02/18/03 Tue
Author: mb
Subject: Re: Two OT's and I don't think Flores ever sat down.
In reply to: MaacGruff 's message, "Two OT's and I don't think Flores ever sat down." on 22:40:46 02/16/03 Sun

I've disagreed with the argument that Manhattan lost last eyar becuase of Gonzo burning guys out. That team had a lot of issues. I think Flores was tired (he played 50 minutes) versus Iona, so could be a valid argument. But the bigger factor was what ARCRAT said: seeing these teams twice is an equalizer.

Also, Saintly, the jaspers are 3-2 since Jackette's return (not 1-2). (Although there might be some validity to your argument re: chemistry).

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.