Name (Registered users only):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>> Your pics were so well done that I saved them in .jpg >> and .png formats. > >The photo style ones as JPEG and the cartoon style >ones as PNG, I guess? :) > >> I can repost them to IMGBB, since >> it seems to be working now, but it will take time >> since I would have to check the results, so I don't >> want to do it unless you want and can authorize me to >> repost your work. Let me know. > >By chance I have a browser window open that still >seems to have three of the "bare butt" pics. I think >two of them were mostly only interesting to >demonstrate what AI would agree to do and how AI got >some things right and others wrong. Although even then >they were kind of intense in some ways too. But the >third one might be worth keeping. > >> Also, I don't understand the difference between a URL >> for the IMGBB "page" (dangerous according to Lucas) >> and the "actual picture" (safe according to Lucas). > >To take an example, this is a link to a pic (a literal >JPEG file) hosted on the BBC website: > >https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/fe1 >b/live/240fd8b0-844a-11f0-ba3b-2b97ad93442d.jpg > >And this is a link to a web page (an HTML file) that >happens to include (use) that pic as part of it: > >https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy3zel0r3go > >The only effective difference is that the IMGBB >"pages" are intended to have the pics in them as their >main topic. > >Having said all this.... in theory whoever runs IMGBB >could change what's in a .jpg or .png file hosted on >their site, just as easily as they can decide what to >put in their HTML files. > >But of course, an image hosting site that did that too >often, would go out of business. It would be like a >major league baseball team that regularly but >inexplicably replaced their baseball games with a >demonstration of line dancing, with no advance warning. > >So nothing is ever 100% "safe", just some things are a >lot safer. > >I've never known flickr add weird things to pages, for >example.... but I don't go anywhere near its >"recommendations" pages. > >As a side note (which may help understanding). I >originally made both the above links from the >corpun.com research website (a page about slippering >in British grammar schools, and the top pic from it). >But the gentleman who runs that website has configured >his web server not to allow direct links from other >sites (like this one) to pics hosted on his site. >Which is understandable, he's paying for it. > >> Can you explain how I can link to the pic and not the >> page? > >Now there, you got me. I don't even know what you do >to link to the page. (Are you using some IMGBB app? I >never have.) I think I gave a summary of what I do to >link to the pic instead of to the page. > >I think Graeme is only using apps (because only on a >phone) so maybe he understands that side better? > >Maybe Romain can explain it better than I can....
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.