VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789 ]
Subject: Re: Boys vs girls at school


Author:
Gary Steven to Sandra
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 04:24:40 10/25/25 Sat
In reply to: Sandra for Gary Steven 's message, "Re: Boys vs girls at school" on 13:05:01 10/20/25 Mon

Frankly, I never could understand double standards myself. I guess being a child of the 60's. I thought it was wrong to let girls get away with things that boys should get spanked for and vice versa depending on the situation. At the same time, I thought it was wrong for girls to be treated more strictly than boys. Boys were allowed to do things because "boys will be boys" and girls were expected to be "young ladies". School dress codes were a perfect example. Boys had to wear pants, not jeans and keep their shirts tucked in. Girls had to wear dresses or skirts. NO pants not even under their skirts. Tights or pantyhose were allowed. While boys got spanked more often than girls, for the most part a boy got paddled over the seat of his pants. Girls on the other hand could find themselves getting their skirt or dress pulled up and getting spanked on their panties even in front of the class. It wasn't considered inappropriate at the time. Even in the media of the time, it was ok for a girl to be spanked on her panties but boy spankings were normally done on a fully clothed bottom. For example, The kids' comics and comic strips like Little Audrey, Little Dot, Nancy and so forth often showed the girls getting spanked on the seat of their panties. But boys got spanked fully dressed.

I find double standards to be strange, no matter which gender they favor. A good example is, when relating the story about mom spanking my brother and me along with our cousins in the department store. There are people who have commented on that who have come out in favor of us boys all getting spanked, but would turn around and say that Carmen should not have been spanked publicly like the rest of us even though she was literally the ring leader (as was the usual case with her). Granted, she was older having just turned thirteen and I will be the first to admit that her's would be the most embarrassing spanking because she had a bigger audience than my younger cousin Jimmy and I did. But I really don't get the comments I received from people saying it's ok that mom spanked the four of us boys bare but not her. Telling me she shouldn't have been spanked at all or it shouldn't have been public like the rest of us got. She even tried to play the teen card, saying she was too old for a spanking and so forth, which mom told her, "You are old enough to know better." Using today's slang, she had an FAFO moment.

I had a co-worker who was from Germany once tell me that she never spanked her daughter, but she did spank her sons. Her logic was "Girls don't need spankings because you can reason with them." "Boys need to be spanked because they are boys and that's all they understand." On the flip side. I noticed girls had more strict curfews and weren't allowed to date as young as boys were. The excuses were "it's to protect the girls reputation" or to just come out and say it, "Boys can't get pregnant."

So while I get your point, Double Standards either way are just wrong in my opinion.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.