Name (Registered users only):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>This question came up from time on the blue forum and >the yellow forum, but I wanted to hear any comments on >this forum. > >----By keeping one’s hands by his side, the boy >shows that he is not self-conscious. > >Willy (2020, Voy 223876) wished to demonstrate that >“my nudity was no big deal.” > >Manuel (2022, Voy 206801) was told that “we're not >doing anything wrong and if we're not doing anything >wrong, then we shouldn't be trying to hide anything.” > >Manuel (2022, Voy 206801) further explained that “we >were not to be ashamed or embarrassed no matter the >development we were in. Some were more mature than >others, some were slow developers, and then others >shaved to make themselves appear younger.” > >----Appearing uninhibited prevents the girls from >feeling embarrassed. > >Willy (2020, Voy 223876) again. Dim (2020, Voy 223876) >recalled such a rule being announced at a Russian >summer camp, where the boys’ showers were supervised >by older girl counsellors. > >I interpret this to mean that the boy is embarrassed, >and the girl is therefore embarrassed because she does >not know how to react. > >----It was “offensive to the girls.” > >Sean (2021, Voy 206801) suggested this as a >possibility. >I'm not sure I understand correctly. >This could mean that a boy's penis is visually >pleasurable to a girl, that a boy cupping his penis is >indifferent to the girl's desire for visual pleasure, >and that the boy is therefore indifferent to the >girl's needs and desires. >Does anyone have a different interpretation: > >----It “draws more attention to oneself.” > >Willy (2020, Voy 223876) mentioned this as one of the >frequent arguments. Manuel (2022, Voy 206801) was told >that “hiding something brings so much attention the >wrong way.” > >----It showed lack of concentration on swimming. > >Willy (2020, Voy 223876) also mentioned this as one of >the frequent arguments. > >sean (2021, Voy 206801) also suggested that “the >coach just wanted us to be focusing on our swimming >knowing if we were touching ourselves a lot, we >wouldn't be focusing on the right things.” This is a >strong possibility, since coaches also objected to >erections for the same reason. > >----It infringed on the girl’s desire to look. > >ss sean (2022, Voy 206801) suspected that one reason >was “so the girls could see your erection without . >. . interference. Since most of the rules were >determined by females in charge, the coach etc., the >rules for not covering was for the benefit of the >female spectators.” > >If I understand Willy (2020, Voy 223876) correctly, he >believes that the girls’ view of the boy swimmers’ >genitals is an inborn right, and any obstruction of >that view is an infringement of that right: > >"When nude, I felt I had left my modesty in my bedroom >with my clothes. I accepted once I stepped out of my >bedroom I was on full display to the girls and should >not expect to be afforded any modesty. . . To me the >most appropriate thing to do was allowed the girls to >look. Covering myself seemed to me to be rude and >disrespectful to the girls." > >Any more opinions?
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy >;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.