Re: Nude shoot -- new childhood nudity forum.

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject: Re: Nude shoot

Author:
Captain Crunch
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09:01:34 08/17/25 Sun
Author Host/IP: 107.130.116.129
In reply to: Anon 's message, "Nude shoot" on 01:46:45 08/17/25 Sun

>I don't feel comfortable posting without anonymity but
>I am happy to tell you about a very unique experience
>I had in 1994, when I was ten.
>An advertisement was placed in a forum asking if a boy
>aged 9-12 would be willing to accept a percentage of
>revenue for three artistic, not sexual, photographs
>which were taken by a female photographer who had
>taken similar pictures but of boys in underwear.
>My mother was living on the breadline then, so
>persuaded me to go forward for the idea. The following
>week we took a journey to Hampshire and the shoot,
>which only lasted about 20 minutes, was done.
>The photographs were privately auctioned for a
>significant amount of money and my mother was
>financially secure for a while after that day.

Technically 'nude' means without clothes on -- including underwear. Some people do call 'naked' if you are only in your undies, but you're not really 'nude' until your genitals are showing.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (Registered users only):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>I don't feel comfortable posting without anonymity but >>I am happy to tell you about a very unique experience >>I had in 1994, when I was ten. >>An advertisement was placed in a forum asking if a boy >>aged 9-12 would be willing to accept a percentage of >>revenue for three artistic, not sexual, photographs >>which were taken by a female photographer who had >>taken similar pictures but of boys in underwear. >>My mother was living on the breadline then, so >>persuaded me to go forward for the idea. The following >>week we took a journey to Hampshire and the shoot, >>which only lasted about 20 minutes, was done. >>The photographs were privately auctioned for a >>significant amount of money and my mother was >>financially secure for a while after that day. > >Technically 'nude' means without clothes on -- >including underwear. Some people do call 'naked' if >you are only in your undies, but you're not really >'nude' until your genitals are showing.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.