Re: Cincinnati Bengals -- Niagara Sports

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sunday, May 19, 09:15:02am

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

Subject: Re: Cincinnati Bengals

Author:
NUSuperfan

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Friday, April 26, 09:26:35am
Author Host/IP: fl-67-233-140-154.dhcp.embarqhsd.net/67.233.140.154
In reply to: NUSuperfan 's message, "Re: Cincinnati Bengals" on Thursday, April 25, 05:48:26pm

You still got a good player. Fans are not happy in Buffalo and with good reason.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Cincinnati Bengals
Author: Maldez [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: Friday, April 26, 11:44:50am Author Host/IP: syn-024-059-042-147.res.spectrum.com/24.59.42.147 Yeah, not sure what the Bills' thinking was in trading the pick...I suppose they thought an equally good WR would be available in round 2. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]