VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]
Subject: I Heard That.


Author:
Lord Doom
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:02:40 07/13/01 Fri
In reply to: Mandikins 's message, "Aww bless! Storm!" on 14:58:45 07/12/01 Thu
 I dont generally talk to underlings but since you snickered at me I thought i would advise you that I Hear and Know Everything.

It's the antennae.

It is worthy of you that you should wish to emulate me. However, your fragile frame could not withstand my powerful refulgence. It is enough to look on me and weep. Since you can never hope to be like me, here are some words to help guide you on your path so that one day you may become a productive member of my bureaucracy.

It is not so much class that is impossible, but rather the collapse, and thus the futility, of class. The subject is contextualised into a structural paradigm of discourse that includes culture as a totality. It could be said that a number of sublimations concerning a posttextual paradox may be discovered. The term 'the neotextual paradigm of discourse' denotes the difference between reality and class. Thus, Marx suggests the use of pretextual appropriation to deconstruct archaic perceptions of narrativity.

If one examines the capitalist paradigm of consensus, one is faced with a choice: either reject predeconstructive desublimation or conclude that expression comes from the masses, but only if consciousness is distinct from truth; otherwise, Sartre's model of dialectic desituationism is one of "dialectic theory", and hence responsible for archaic perceptions of consciousness. Marx's essay on Baudrillardist hyperreality holds that sexual identity has objective value. Thus, if predeconstructive desublimation holds, we have to choose between dialectic desituationism and neosemioticist desituationism.

I hope that you will profit from this excerpt from the Doomania Manifesto and soon be promoted to a position of leadership within my benevolent dictatorship.

I will Keep My Eye On You.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
erm....Mandikins03:37:57 07/13/01 Fri
i completely disagree with neosemioticist desituationism (NT)medeis09:50:12 07/14/01 Sat

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.