average banter -- The Otters Banter

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: average banter

Author:
herbie

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:06:17 06/11/01 Mon

impersonating a member of the otter's committee is an extrememly serious offence, punishable by expulsion. if you didn't know this and don't like it, tough. i have just decided, perfectly within my rights read the constitution. so whoever is trying to divide the committee stop it it won't work. rupert i don't think you have average banter, well most of the time anyway.

whilst i am here there have been a lot of accusations flying around as to the identity of william hill. most of them seem to be coming from sully which leads me to believe that the mysterious mr hill and until now rather clever is none other than our esteemed treasurer. it all makes sense, wild accusations, plenty of time on his hands, keen to get the number of hits up on his website, always the first to alert us to any new banter on the website via e-mail, a little to keen to get us to read your latest gag sull. and now you are reduced to blaming ike's failure to access the site as some attempt to throw us of the scent rather than your own technical incompetence.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]