VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:36
Author: ketch-16May02
Subject: Re: Mu/Atlantis continued
In reply to: Dwayanu-16May02 's message, "Re: Mu/Atlantis continued" on 18:34

How you love to twist the facts.

Firstly, as to the irrelevant issue of the ending of the ice age. This took place over several thousand years. You claimed that it happened overnight. Now you are trying to say that you actually meant it happened gradually. You also refer to one minor period at the end of the ice age, and mistake this for the entire ice age. You are simply spouting garbage.

"Obviously, Paulsen is talking about a large asteroid and perhaps mistakenly refers to it as a planetoid. How large does an asteroid have to be to be called a planetoid? What the heck is a planetoid, anyway. So, you argue over silly details and try thereby to misdirect people."

Perhaps the words pot, kettle and black could be used here. Paulsen refers to a "gigantic planetoid". Asteroids can be 100km or more. Obviously Paulsen is refering to a very large asteroid which he calls a gigantic planetoid. It must have had disasterous consequences if it destroyed an entire continent. It would have had to be the largest impact since life has existed on the Earth.

"As far as the impact from the event that Paulsen describes being large enough to wipe out life totally, obviously that did not happen. So, obviously, the one that wiped out the dinosaurs was larger"

Well yes, for once you have said something which makes sense. The impact which eliminated the dinosaurs was obviously larger since the impact Paulsen writes about did not occur.

"It seems that your only intention is to degrade Paulsen in any way you can, regardless of the facts. You just twist them to fit what you want."

Not the main purpose, but yes, proving Paulsen to be a total fake is an enjoyable pastime. However there is no need to twist the facts at all. Simply quoting from Paulsens ridiculous writing is usually quite good enough.

Perhaps you do not understand the way this board works. Firstly someone will state an opinion, then others will disagree, agree or add to what they have said. If you state some evidence and make one argument, others may find flaws in your arguments. Is that too hard for you to understand? That is what discussion and debate is. It does not consist of accepting something just because one of Paulsen's lackeys says so.

"C'mon, Ketch, when are you going to give it up and actually check out the evidence?"

Perhaps when you actually present some. I have challenged you to produce some credible scientific evidence for the existence of an island continent in the Atlantic ocean. You have had several months to find some, but so far have failed to do so. I have challenged you to provide any mention of "The Builders" and "The Nephilim" outside of Paulsen's writings and you have failed to do so. The same can be said for your other claims.


"The evidence of the cataclysm that destroyed Mu and Atlantis; the undeniable (at least by any REASONABLE standard) evidence that UFOs exist and vehicles and beings have been 'recovered' from 'crashed' ones, and you like many others are the victims of a tremendous campaign to obsure the truth fo these things. The evidence is there for any reasonable man or woman to investigate. I have given some of that evidence in previous posts. Do yourself a favor and check it out. Drop your own campaign to discredit Paulsen and try to find out the truth yourself."

I might say the same about your obsession with Paulsen. The evidence that he is a fake is overwhelming. Much of what he writes has been shown to be impossible on this board. When are you going to admit that Paulsen is a fake? He has never been on any alien spacships, he has only a very limited knowledge of yoga, he was never a Lord of Mu, he never destroyed Lucifer, picked up any alien hitchhiker or got space shipwrecked on any alien planets etc. He is simply a very sad man trying to exploit his brief acquaintance with Yogananda, without which no one would take him seriously at all.

When are you going to start facing up to reality Joe?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.