[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6789 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:05
Author: ketch-22Apr02
Subject: Re: Atlantis's proof
In reply to: Anon-22Apr02 's message, "Re: Atlantis's proof" on 07:04

The Genesis flood is usually placed at about 4,000 B.C. by biblical scholars. Mayans were writing in Roman times, well after the supposed destruction of Atlantis. How then is this in any way evidence of the existence of Atlantis? All it suggests is that more than one flood may have occured in the history of the Earth. Hardly a surprising discovery.

"Perhaps, Sri Paulsen "rediscovered" Atlantis and Mu through the teachings of The builders mentioned in his biography."

Yes, but then again, perhaps he just made it up.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.