Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch -- KRIYA YOGA DISCUSSION BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:12
Author: ketch-13Apr02
Subject: Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch
In reply to: Dwayanu - 13 April 2002 's message, "Christ Child: continued for Ketch" on 10:07

Strange that you should raise this subject again in a new thread. I had said in a previous post that I would drop the subject as you were obviously unable to answer the points I made. Here you bring the matter up again. Which one of us is it who is unable to let the matter go?

"The problem for you is that for most everything that he says that you feel is purely fantasy, you do not have any way to know for sure whether it is true or not. You have said this yourself, in other words. For example, you cannot prove beyond any shred of doubt that the story of the Builders is not true. So, your mind has chosen the one issue that you feel you can prove."

It is certainly not the only case where Paulsen's claims can be disproved. His fantasies about Mu and Atlantis are another example which can be completely disproved. In fact if you care to look at previous posts you will see that I have mentioned many of his fantasies, not just the issue of the physical birth of this baby on New Year's Eve 1960.

Most of the issues you mention are dealt with in this post.

Earth to Joe

It may help you see why you cling to your interpretation of what Norman has written about the Christ Child, when, in fact, there are very few others in the world who have read that book who share the same interpretation.

Presumably you have conducted a survey of everyone else who has read the book? As for how it should be interpreted, I have provided many examples from the text to show what Paulsen actually wrote. You have failed to provide any counter examples. Everyone will have to make up their own minds oin the basis of the information provided.

"Exchange unprofitable religious speculations for actual God-contact. Clear your mind of dogmatic theological debris; let in the fresh, healing waters of direct perception."

Wisdom from Lahiri Mahasaya.
I wonder what he would say about someone who had wasted his life chasing after another persons fantasies about UFO's, lost continents and alien invasions?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch -- Hendrik - 14 April 2002, 10:13
- Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch -- Dwayanu - 15 April 2002, 10:14
Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch -- Dwayanu-13Apr02, 10:15
- Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch -- ketch-13Apr02, 10:16
  - Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch -- Anonymous-15April02, 10:17
    - Re: Christ Child: continued for Ketch -- ketch-15April02, 10:18