Re: Peter's answer to your BLASPHEMPY (sic)! -- SAUL OF TARSUS, THE ANTICHRIST

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:42:49 12/15/06 Fri
Author: Nada (hopeful)
Subject: Re: Peter's answer to your BLASPHEMPY (sic)!
In reply to: David R.W. Wadsworth, Servant of the Most High and One True God 's message, "Re: Peter's answer to your BLASPHEMPY (sic)!" on 14:59:21 11/23/02 Sat

>Subject: Re: Peter's answer to your BLASPHEMPY (sic)!
>Date: 11/22/02
>From: David R.W. Wadsworth
>To: stein
>
>
>I apologize to all who read the above lack of
>scholarly pursuit, regurgitated, extremely infantile,
>anonymous post, under the pseudonym, "stein" without
>an earlier reply but I moved, was without the internet
>for three months, broke my collar bone and was in
>extreme pain for another couple of months, sprained my
>back in May doing what someone my age should not be
>doing, and just trying to get my life back to normal.
>Plus the direct email with questions about the web
>site for The Millennial Dispensation.org is four times
>as heavy and has kept me swamped.
>
>-> Anonymous minion of Satan, you wrote in the subject
>blank, "Peter's answer to your BLASPHEMPY (sic)!" then
>in the body, you cited "2 Peter 3:15 And account that
>the longsuffering (sic) of our Lord is salvation; even
>as our beloved brother Paul also according to the
>wisdom given unto him hath (sic) written unto you;"
>
>"2 Peter 3:16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in
>them of these things; in which are some things hard to
>be understood, which they that are unlearned and
>unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures,
>unto their own destruction."
>
>Don't be beguiled people. This is the only and the old
>party line of Satan's Professional Faith Merchants,
>the 20th and 21st Century Pharisaic antichrist.
>
>Since when does calling Saul of Tarsus brother, in
>verse 15, equate to being ordained to the Apostleship?
>
>For the benefit of all who read this:
>
>1) the word "Apostle" in Greek means "one sent forth."
>After Saul had one of his Pharisaic cohorts
>impersonate Ananias, who died for lying to he Holy
>Spirit and whose was being blackmailed by Saul to
>enter into the conspiracy to testify to Peter, James
>and John that Saul of Tarsus had been converted to
>Christianity, Peter, James and John had ordained Saul
>of Tarsus as the missionary of Barnabas to go out and
>teach the Jews the Gospel. Saul erroneously pounce on
>the "being sent forth" in the Christian vernacular as
>being an ordination to the Apostleship except, there
>were already 12 Apostles at the time of Saul's lie and
>fraud.
>
>2) In the first century A.D., it was an accepted
>colloquial use of the word "Apostle" to mean was we
>would today call "a groupie," a "hanger-on," or "one
>deeply devoted" to someone. Saul of Tarsus was
>educated in Greece and was very aware of the
>colloquial vernacular. He figured if he was criticized
>for saying he was an "Apostle" when he wasn't, he had
>these two excuses, the first rather weak but the
>second very strong in his own defense if he got caught
>lying and impersonating a real Apostle.
>
>However, Jesus Christ said to search the scriptures,
>for in them ye think ye have eternal life. Everything
>of major importance to Christianity ARE written down!
>If it isn't written down, t didn't happen!
>
>Jesus also said, "By the mouth of two or three
>witnesses shall every word be established."
>
>You can get two or three people to attest to anything
>but Jesus Christ said "witnesses" believable, upright
>people of good standing not the enemy.
>
>When Peter said, "our beloved brother Saul" -- Saul
>was mistranslated to Paul -- Peter was personally
>forgiving Saul of his transgressions against the
>Christian but Peter's forgiveness does not mean Jesus
>Christ forgave him. Jesus Christ said the person has
>to ask forgiveness and repent before they are
>forgiven. However, Saul wrote that he didn't need to
>repent,
>
>Romans 11:29
>
> 29 For the gifts and calling of God [are] without
>repentance.
>
>God will not call a murderer, an adulator, a pagan, a
>Satanist etc. until they prove themselves worthy and
>repent of their iniquity. They MUST repent first! Saul
>of Tarsus never repented but was trying to undermine
>Christianity till the day he died!
>
>As for 2 Peter 3:16, servants of Satan, antichrists
>capitalize on the "other scriptures" implying that
>Peter recognized Saul's writings to the various
>Gentile churches as "scripture." Professional Faith
>Merchants show their ignorance of the scriptures and
>that they are truly minions of Satan because the only
>scriptures that anybody had when Peter wrote this was
>the Torah and Talmud.
>
>Peter was saying that Paul explained things of the
>Mosaic Law, some of which are hard to understand
>especially for those who are unlearned and unstable in
>the things of God and the learning of man as they also
>do with other scriptures!
>
>Peter was not referring to Saul�s writings as
>scripture because the New Testament as we know it
>today did not exist before 1500 A.D. Before 500 A.D.,
>the New Testament scripture wasn�t collected,
>selected, translated, canonized and compiled into the
>New Testament by the Catholic Church. Writings were
>included from various people who were not Apostles
>just because they seemed to promote Christianity.
>Other writings like those of Barnabas were burnt
>because they were damningly critical of Saul of
>Tarsus, the man Jesus Christ said was a liar of Satan
>and the antichrist. Even then, there were bitter
>debates as to what was and was not scripture and what
>did and did not promote the teachings of Christ. Many
>monks were summarily taken out and beheaded because
>they were adamant that the pagan King Constantine was
>Paganizing Christianity. Look at the teachings of the
>Catholic Church today! None of them even resemble the
>teachings of what Christ taught.
>
>Choose ye this day whom ye will serve, God or Satan. I
>pray you'll study and pray to God about the things I
>have written. Contrary to the antichrist, Saul of
>Tarsus, God does not promote confusion and does not
>send deluding influences that you might believe a lie.
>God is not evil. Shun Satan and the antichrist! The
>choice is yours! You eternity depends on that choice!
>
>
>
>David R.W. Wadsworth
>Servant of the Most High and One True God
>
>DAS IDYLLWILD SCHONGEBIET
>MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 617
>SHIPPING ADDRESS: 25685 Big Pine
>Idyllwild, CA 92549
>
>Voice, TDD & Fax: (909) 659-0130
>
>DRWWadsworth@greencafe.com
>
>THE MILLENNIAL DISPENSATION
>
>http://www.themillennialdispensation.org
>
>NOTE: Amor gignit amorem (Love begats love). Remember,
>whether your God is an entity; a personage; a spirit;
>omniscient; omnipresent; objectivity, enlightenment,
>intelligence or a concept, God is Love and Satan is
>hate!
>
>Love and sex, while one can enhance the other, they
>mutually exclusive and come in a variety of forms and
>fashions, the beauty and morality of which depends
>upon its expression.
>
>Man can be assured his God was created in his own
>image when his God hates the same people he does.
>
>Is anyone so absolutely positive that their beliefs
>are in fact true, void of any clearly definable proof
>to the contrary, that after being able to exercise
>their God given right to freely make a choice, they
>would condemn someone else for making a different
>choice? Such is the Plan of Satan!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Peter's answer to your BLASPHEMPY (sic)! -- gabe, 14:45:08 01/05/07 Fri

Re: Peter's answer to your BLASPHEMPY (sic)! -- Gabe, 14:46:57 01/05/07 Fri

Re: Peter's answer to your BLASPHEMPY (sic)! -- Gabe Falcon, 14:50:47 01/05/07 Fri