Re: I've thought about it quite a bit -- SAUL OF TARSUS, THE ANTICHRIST

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:42:41 07/21/06 Fri
Author: Julian
Subject: Re: I've thought about it quite a bit
In reply to: David R.W. Wadsworth, Servant of the Most High and One True God 's message, "Re: I've thought about it quite a bit" on 13:35:00 04/27/03 Sun

For sure Paul is false apostle. It is possible that he existed just after Christ. If Paul really existed during Jesus Christ�s ministry Paul still the evil one that killed the Christians and he is God�s enemy.

I had revelation and inspiration about Luke�s book for the past few months. I never believed that someone else thought the same way I did. But after reading your topic I believed so. I know that Paul forged the book of Acts and placed Luke name instead to have a witness for his false ministry. Since Luke was accused to be the Author of the book of acts and used Luke name instead it means that Luke didn�t exist then. And if Luke existed how could Luke allow Paul to use his name. I have feeling that Luke was dead when the book of Acts was issued, but Luke was so young during Paul�s false ministry to die in this young age, unless he died in sickness or was assassinated. Did Paul wait for Luke to die or he killed him to use his name. Did Luke ever exist? By reading Luke gospel we notice that this book has similarity with the book of Acts. Since I am sure that Paul is the Author of the book of (Acts); it means that Paul is the author of the book of Luke also.

The passage of Jesus that in the book of Acts that has similarity is in the book of Luke also it confirms to me that Paul is the Author of both books. This passage blasphemes the Lord Jesus Christ; I am not mention about this passage till later.

By Julian God�s prophet

>TG,
>
>
>I agree with most of what you wrote. This then is only
>to teach you the truth of those things you are unsure
>of or don't know.
>
>-> You wrote, "I've been on a massive spiritual quest
>since I was about 10 years old. Seek the truth, and
>you shall find
>it."
>
>More importantly, Jesus Christ said,
>
>John 8:32
>
>Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you
>free
>
>-> And, "What I found is much different than what
>modern day False Christians loudly proclaim through
>their judgements (sic) and condemnations. God is love.
>And the Kingdom of Heaven is inside us. Christ is our
>Lord and God is our Father. But JC is also our
>brother,defender (sic ) and King."
>
>Very true!
>
>-> Then you wrote, "I fear Paul is our enemy and the
>way the bible has been twisted over the years, the
>wicked one has raised Paul to 'god like' status."
>
>Don't fear anything but know the truth and the truth
>shall not only make you free, it will make you
>fearless against the forces of Satan! Trust in God and
>neither Satan nor his emissaries will cause you any
>concern!
>
>-> Then you wrote, "Any church I've ever been to
>quotes constantly from Paul's writings, but rarely
>from those of the Gospels of Christ."
>
>Be careful referring to "The Gospels" as a general
>term. 15 year old Mark, while a member of the Church
>of Jesus Christ and the cousin of Barnabas -- a
>Christian ordained with Saul of Tarsus as only his
>missionary companion -- Mark was not an Apostle. He
>had no real knowledge with which to chronicle the life
>of Jesus Christ. It is said that he was the
>ghostwriter for Peter. But he does not state from whom
>he got his information. Therefore, since he wrote it
>in the first person, the Gospel Mark is fraudulent and
>the only value it has is if a bona fide Apostle writes
>the same or similar thing, to and as a confirmation.
>
>Fifteen (15) year old Luke was also not an Apostle but
>the Grecian pagan berdache (male spouse) of Saul of
>Tarsus, whom he pressed into his conspiratorial plot,
>commissioned by the Sanhedrin. Luke was 15 years old
>when pressed into service by Saul of Tarsus, which
>meant he was only 12 when Jesus Christ walked and
>taught the Jews. Luke was Saul of Tarsus' cover to
>write the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles,
>which centers around Saul of Tarsus �- Saul of Tarsus
>is mentioned 148 times but all of he other 12 Apostles
>are only mentioned 52 time and 8 are not even
>mentioned once �- just to give him a air of legitimacy
>but as Jesus Christ said, he was a liar of Satan and
>the antichrist. These are not my words but those of
>Jesus Christ.
>
>-> And, "Most 'Christians' these days know very little
>about the history of the bibl (sic) - they don't know
>who really wrote it, how it was put together, nor even
>that Paul was NOT an Apostle of Jesus Christ."
>
>Very true! Although most Christians despised the Great
>and Abominable pagan Whore of the Earth, the Church of
>Satan which the bona fide Apostle John Prophesied
>would be built upon seven hills -- Rome, most
>Christians accept without question, the inclusion of
>the writings of Saul of Tarsus in the Bible. Satan
>influenced the Catholic (Universal) Church to include
>the writings of Saul of Tarsus in with the other
>records of the Bible. After he lied to the Apostles
>and said he was a baptized Christian and wanted to
>preach the Gospel, he and Barnabas were ordained as
>missionary companions only. However, Barnabas'
>writings, which are very, very critical of Saul of
>Tarsus for teaching false teachings while they were
>traveling together, was never included in the Bible
>with those of Saul of Tarsus'.
>
>-> And then you wrote, "They don't know Paul came
>hundreds of years after Christ."
>
>This is in error! Although Saul of Tarsus was a
>contemporary of Jesus Christ, Saul of Tarsus, being a
>died in the wool Pharisee, had never met nor was in
>the presence Jesus Christ who called Pharisees,
>hypocrites.
>
>-> Then you wrote, "And they don't know what authority
>Paul had..."
>
>He had none but what the Sanhedrin gave him to
>persecute and murder Christians!
>
>-> '... - he had a single vision."
>
>Saul of Tarsus had no witnesses but his Pharisaic
>entourage which was and is hardly believable.
>
>-> You wrote, "Still yet, most churches refer to Saul
>of Tarsus today as the 'apostle paul'."
>
>Because most people are beguiled by Satan into
>accepting the Pope and the Catholic Church without
>question.
>
>-> Then you also wrote, "Then boom, about 200 years
>later Saul of Tarsus comes on the scene and proclaims
>himself (through the power of the Roman Church) to be
>a new 'savior' for mankind through his actions, deeds
>and words. Paul seems to talk with the same authority
>as Christ, Himself."
>
>Saul of Tarsus was a contemporary of Peter, James and
>John and therefore of Jesus Christ also!
>
>-> And then you also wrote, "And Paul definitely
>contradicts Christ's teachings. Not only does he do
>this, but he seems to make new policy regarding the
>'law' and our forgivenss through 'christ'."
>
>Very true!
>
>-> You wrote, "Was Saul of Tarsus the Anti-Christ...we
>will not know until we are made aware of it by God I
>guess."
>
>You have already! Jesus Christ said,
>
>John 5:31
>
> 31 � If I alone bear witness of myself, my witness
>is not true.
>
>Not one bona fide Apostle ever said Saul of Tarsus was
>an Apostle. Besides, there were already 12 Apostles
>and Saul named an additional nine people he called
>Apostles who were never ordained.
>
>Saul of Tarsus studied in Greece. Although as Christ
>said, an Apostle was a person ordained with authority
>and meant one sent forth, Saul knew it was
>colloquially used that an Apostle was a "devout
>follower" or as we say today, "a groupie."
>
>
>
>
>
>David R.W. Wadsworth
>Servant of the Most High and One True God
>
>DAS IDYLLWILD SCHONGEBIET
>MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 617
>SHIPPING ADDRESS: 25685 Big Pine
>Idyllwild, CA 92549
>Voice, TDD: (909) 659-0130
>
>DRWWadsworth@greencafe.com
>
>THE MILLENNIAL DISPENSATION
>
>http://www.themillennialdispensation.org/
>
>NOTE: Amor gignit amorem (Love begats love). Remember,
>whether your God is an entity; a personage; a spirit;
>omniscient; omnipresent; objectivity, enlightenment,
>intelligence or a concept, God is Love and Satan is
>hate!
>
>Love and sex, while one can enhance the other, they
>are mutually exclusive and come in a variety of forms
>and fashions the beauty and morality, of which depends
>upon its expression.
>
>Man can be assured his God was created in his own
>image when his God hates the same people he does.
>
>Is anyone so absolutely positive that their beliefs
>are in fact true, void of any clearly definable proof
>to the contrary, that after being able to exercise
>their God given right to freely make a choice, they
>would condemn someone else for making a different
>choice? Such is the Plan of Satan!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]