Re: Response -- SAUL OF TARSUS, THE ANTICHRIST

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:07:56 11/05/10 Fri
Author: jamie (peace)
Subject: Re: Response
In reply to: Ulysses 's message, "Response" on 01:07:55 10/15/08 Wed

In responce to: "You do realize that the Acts of the apostles were written by the first 12 apostles, right?"

The author of Acts is traditionally identified as Luke the Evangelist, a disciple of Saul of Tarsus. 55% of the New Testament was written by Saul of Tarsus. The Bible we know today was collated by the pagan Roman emperor Constantine the Great. Be careful of what you believe "The Word".

>I just don't understand... How can you believe in
>Jesus Christ and believe what you have written down?
>Are you sure that what you thought was the spirit of
>God leading you to a verse not the spirit of Satan
>leading you to your own demise? You do realize that
>the Acts of the apostles were written by the first 12
>apostles, right?
> First off, the scripture in Matthew talks about the
>Apostles; but what about when Judas died? Didn't the
>remainder of the twelve cast lots to decide upon a new
>one? And not only that, but if they wrote the Acts,
>doesn't that mean that they too would be Antichristal
>in their beliefs if they wrote of conversion on the
>road to Damascus?
>
> And how do you get off, talking about things and
>matters that are expressed in the Quran? A book that
>was written hundreds of years after Jesus left... What
>makes the Quran profitable for doctrine? Their mention
>of Christ? That's like believing that the Catholic
>Church was the first form of Christianity, and that
>there actually is a such thing as a Pope? Surely you
>jest!!!
>
> It seems that you have severely misplaced your
>faith my friend...I do understand your sense of
>urgency to post this on the internet; if I felt the
>same way you did, I would've done no less...
>
> Seriously, there is NO WAY that any man, or angel or
>creature of any form can pervert the Bible...ITS
>SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE!!! The Word of God is the physical
>representation of Christ on Earth; so says John (St.
>John chapter one)... (paraphrasing) 'In the beginning
>was the Word. And the Word was God...'
>
> Did you forget those things upon believing what
>you've written?
>
> Heaven and Earth will come to pass my friend... But
>HIS word shall always stand...
>
> There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that anyone can do to
>pervert the Word... It can and has been tried (the
>'holy scriptures' of the Watchtower Bible and Tract
>Society, commonly known as the Kingdom Hall of
>Jehova's Witnesses), but the truth will ALWAYS be out
>there...
>
>I bring you this message in love and enlightenment...
>
>Peace be unto you

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]