VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:18:33 08/06/02 Tue
Author: Julian
Subject: Re: You are saying that Jesus Christ is a liar!
In reply to: David R.W. Wadsworth 's message, "You are saying that Jesus Christ is a liar!" on 15:36:28 09/10/01 Mon

David

you are right about the contradiction between Paul and Jesus, but I don't know about the word (bowels). It sounds bad for an apostle that is inspired by God. But do you think that it could be an expression or a saying in those days.

Julian


>Subject: You are saying that Either Your "Apostle"
>Paul is a fraud, a liar, an Apostle of Satan and the
>antichrist or Jesus Christ is!
>Date: 9/10/01
>From: David R.W. Wadsworth
>To: Anonymous Minion and Disciple of Satan
>Forum: Saul of Tarsus, the Antichrist
>Thread:
>
>
>-> You titled your communiqué, "The Apostle Paul is a
>Saint and Martyr."
>
>You are an extremely gullible, unread lover of Satan!
>
>Did not Jesus Christ teach,
>
>Matthew 18:16
>
> 16 But if he will not hear [thee, then] take with
>thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or
>three witnesses every word may be established.
>
>Who but Saul of Tarsus said or testified that he was
>an Apostle or Jesus Christ?
>
>No one!
>
>Then either you are saying that Saul of Tarsus was a
>liar of Satan like Jesus Christ said or else you are
>saying that Jesus Christ is a liar that what he taught
>does not apply to your God, Saul of Tarsus! Either
>way, you seem bound for hell!
>
>Jehovah/Jesus Christ said,
>
>Amos 3:7
>
> 7 Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he
>revealeth (sic) his secret unto his servants the
>prophets.
>
>Saulists are calling Jehovah/Jesus Christ a liar
>because no where is it written that God told the
>Apostle of Saul of Tarsus' claim that Jesus Christ --
>now get this -- "APPOINTED" him as an apostle,
>whatever the hell he meant by appoint. The truth is,
>Saul of Tarsus was not a bonafide, ordained Apostle f
>Jesus Christ. He was "APPOINTED" by Satan.
>
>Read, study, fast and pray to God not Satan. Ask for
>God's wisdom and understanding. Normally, I would need
>not write anything else. Saul of Tarsus has either
>admitted he is a LIAR OF SATAN AND THE
>ANTICHRIST
or he is saying Jesus Christ is. Since
>Saul of Tarsus was commissioned by the Sanhedrin to
>infiltrate and undermine the cult of Christians, he is
>saying that Jesus Christ was a pagan of Satan in
>violation to the Law of Moses!
>
>-> You wrote, "To make such a bogus claim about the
>apostle (sic) paul (sic) reveals someone doesn't read
>or understand the Apostle Paul very well or very much"
>
>This proves Satan and Saul of Tarsus are indeed your
>Gods. I made no claim regarding your Gods. Jesus
>Christ did!
>
>-> You also wrote, "Nevertheless, St. Paul is a very
>learned and godly man, irregardless (sic) of whoevers
>(sic) slandering his good name here, you should be
>ashamed of yourself, for you are bearing false witness
>and thus breaking one of the ten commandments."
>
>Again, your proves you are not a Christian but like
>Saul of Tarsus, lament for the return of the Satanic
>Law of Moses with its embellished 10 Commandments of
>God. In the Gospel of Jehovah, Jehovah gave the
>Israelites ONLY TWO COMMANDMENTS to adhere to,
>1) Love the Lord thy (sic) God and 2) Love
>thy (sic) neighbor (fellowman) as yourself!
Moses,
>in a fit of rag, broke those tablets requiring him to
>get another set. Moses spent 40 days and 40 nights
>haranguing with God for a stricter task master like
>they were familiar with in Egypt. Moses demanded 7 x
>70 commandments for my ancestors. For 40 days and 40
>nights -- hell it only took Him 7 days to make the
>universe -- God kept saying "No!" and Moses kept
>demanding. Finally, Jehovah embellished His two
>commandment and made 10 and promised He would come to
>restore His Gospel to the Israelites. Moses was so
>pissed, when he got down from Mt. Sinai, he issued the
>Israelites 613 life or death, do or die LAWS.
>God was so insulted, He refused to allow Moses to
>enter the promised land!
>
>One reason the Jews rejected Jesus Christ was because
>of Moses' imposition of the Satanic 613 Laws of
>Moses. When Jesus Christ came, He gave the people
>ONLY TWO COMMANDMENTS.
>
>Matthew 22:36-40
>
> 36 Master, which [is] the great commandment in the
>law?
>
> 37 Jesus said unto him, Thou (sic) shalt (sic) love
>the Lord thy (sic) God with all thy (sic) heart, and
>with all thy (sic) soul, and with all thy (sic) mind.
>
> 38 This is the first and great commandment.
>
> 39 And the second [is] like unto it, Thou (sic) shalt
>(sic) love thy (sic) neighbour (sic) as thyself (sic).
>
> 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the
>prophets.
>
>Read Verse 40 again.
>
>“ON THESE TWO COMMANDMENTS HANG ALL THE LAWS AND
>THE PROPHETS,”
which is to say that ALL THE LAWS
>and ALL THE PROPHETS since the beginning of time were
>given to man for the expressed purpose of teaching and
>getting man to adhere to these two commandments only!
>All other verbiage is simply commentary, some of which
>are the nothing more than commandments of men he
>teaches for doctrines of God for some of Satan’s gold!
>
>1 John 4:20
>
> 20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth (sic) his
>brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth (sic) not
>his brother whom he hath (sic) seen, how can he love
>God whom he hath (sic) not seen?
>
>Jesus Christ also said,
>
>Matthew 5:22
>
> 22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with
>his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the
>judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother,
>Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever
>shall say, Thou (sic) fool, shall be in danger of hell
>fire.
>
>NOTE: Raca is a Hebrew expression of contempt like
>faggot, homo, pervert and the disparaging use of the
>words "fool" and "sinner!"
>
>Neither in the ONLY TWO COMMANDMENTS from Jesus
>Christ nor the 10 COMMANDS from Jehovah/Jesus
>Christ was or is there anything let alone, a
>commandment not to love your fellowman. Even Moses'
>codified 613 Laws say nothing about man lying with man.
>
>What is the central theme of Genesis 19, Leviticus
>18:22, Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1:24-27,1 Corinthians
>6:9 and 1 Timothy 1:20? Besides all admittedly being
>"internationally altered" by the Great and Abominable
>pagan Whore of the Earth, the Church of Satan which
>the bonafide Apostle John said would be built upon
>seven hills -- Rome -- all the passages condemn man
>lying with man as with woman! I know you know is an
>impossibility because the plumbing is different but
>hasn't it struck you as inconsistently odd that God
>would be offended at watching two males make love but
>would get His Holy rocks off watching two females have
>sex?
>
>Proof that the Church of Satan altered the passages
>which they admit to having altered!
>
>-> Then you wrote, "Moroever (sic), your not even
>remotely qualified to critique paul (sic) or any other
>scholar for that means,..."
>
>You are right! I'm "...not even remotely qualified to
>critique" Saul of Tarsus and I don't but God is and
>does!
>
>-> And you wrote, "...but I'm curuius (sic) who taught
>you that warp belief, surely it cant be the Holy
>Spirit, for St. Paul surely was His mouth piece, amen!"
>
>I was sent to testify of Jesus. I used to think and
>believe just like you. For 25 years, I refused to
>entertain the thought that Saul of Tarsus was a liar,
>a fraud and the antichrist. I couldn't understand why
>on many different doctrine, Saul and Jesus Christ
>seemed to contradict each other. For example, Jesus
>Christ said the 1st Commandment is to love the Lord
>thy (sic) God but Saul of Tarsus said it is to love
>thy (sic) father and mother! Professional Faith
>Merchants all told me, "They don't contradict each
>other, you are just not reading it with the Spirit of
>God!" However, once I listened to the Holy Spirit that
>Saul of Tarsus does contradict Jesus Christ, is a liar
>and the antichrist, I started to read and understand
>the teachings of Jesus Christ. Satan had been blocking
>out the teachings of Jesus Christ that is why I say
>I'm a Practicing Christian. I PRACTICE ONLY THE
>TEACHINGS OF JESUS CHRIST
not Satan or his
>antichrist!
>
>-> Then you quoted Saul of Tarsus writings in
>Galatians.
>
>What's wrong? Can't find any Jesus Christ taught or
>can you even understand the teachings of Jesus Christ?
>Saul of Tarsus' writings don't mean anything to me any
>more but the words and teachings of Jesus Christ have
>opened up glorious visions to me.
>
>Saul of Tarsus didn't write the passages the way they
>appear in Romans 1:24-27,1 Corinthians 6:9 and 1
>Timothy 1:20. I've already told you that the Church of
>Satan has already admitted to "intentionally altering"
>those passages. Saul was a loyal, true, blue Pharisee
>infiltrating the Christian cult to prove his loyalty
>to the Law of Moses. Saul of Tarsus is quoted as
>having taught, "the law is good." "you are justified
>by the law" and "without the Law, there is no sin,"
>something a true Christian wouldn't say, let alone
>teach! In Romans and Corinthians, the two most
>"sexually permissive" cities on earth at that time who
>were into sexual intercourse while worshipping pagan
>idols. Saul of Tarsus, heavily school in the
>intricacies of the Law of Moses was warning the Romans
>and the Corinthians that worshipping idol was taboo
>under the Law of Moses.
>
>Besides, Saul of Tarsus was a heterosexually divorced
>bisexual who propositioned Philemon or a homosexual
>affair!
>
>KJV (1611): Philemon 1:20
>
>20 Yea, brother, let me have joy of thee in the Lord:
>refresh my bowels in the Lord.
>
>Saul wrote to Philemon, what today would be a
>pornographic love letter saying how much joy he, Saul,
>had in the Lord when he, Philemon, f_cked him, Saul!
>
>The word "bowels" was used 38 times in the Bible, each
>time meaning the internal guts of whatever like the
>inner workings of the earth!
>
>But fret not. Your Professional Faith Merchants have
>already been confronted with the dichotomy and
>contradiction between Saul’s sexual escapades and his
>mistranslated writings in Romans and Corinthians and
>they have altered the wording of their Bibles. This
>presents them with yet another dilemma. If the KJV is
>the infallible, inerrant word of God and it says Saul
>wanted Philemon to f_ck him, how can they alter the
>wording and still accept it as the infallible word of
>God. Satan just digs his hole deeper and deeper until
>he has dug himself and all those who follow him back
>down to hell where he belongs!
>
>
--------------------------

>
>
[TRANSLATED FROM THE LATIN
>VULGATE]

>
>All Bibles were translated and revised from the
>Catholic Vulgate Bible, so other than what they have
>admitted to intentionally mistranslating, it is the
>most accurate Bible known to man.
>
>Vulgate (450): Philemon 1:20
>
>20 Yea, brother. May I enjoy thee in the Lord. Refresh
>my bowels in the Lord.
>
>
--------------------------

>
>YLT ( 1332): Philemon 1:20
>
> 20 Yes, brother, may I have profit of thee in the
>Lord; refresh my bowels in the Lord;
>
>
--------------------------

>
>John Wesley (1770): Philemon 1:20
>
>Yea, brother, let me have joy of thee in the Lord;
>refresh my bowels in Christ. Having confidence of thy
>(sic) obedience I have written to thee, knowing that
>thou (sic) wilt do even more than I say.
>
>
--------------------------

>
>Darby (1884): Philemon 1:20
>
> 20 Yea, brother, I would have profit of thee in
>[the] Lord: refresh my bowels in Christ.
>
>
--------------------------

>
>RSV (1946-1952): Philemon 1:20
>
> 20 Yes, brother, I want some benefit from you in the
>Lord. Refresh my heart in Christ.
>
>This is false! Was not translated from original but
>revised by Professional Faith Merchants who couldn't
>explain the contradiction in his "mistranslated"
>writings verses his sexual appetite and promiscuity!
>
>
--------------------------

>
>NASB (1971): Philemon 1:20
>
> 20 Yes, brother, let me benefit from you in the
>Lord; refresh my heart in Christ.
>
>This is false! Was not translated from original but
>revised by Professional Faith Merchants who couldn't
>explain the contradiction in his "mistranslated"
>writings verses his sexual appetite and promiscuity!
>
>
--------------------------

>
>NIV (1978): Philemon 1:20
>
> 20 I do wish, brother, that I may have some benefit
>from you in the Lord; refresh my heart in Christ.
>
>This is false! Was not translated from original but
>revised by Professional Faith Merchants who couldn't
>explain the contradiction in his "mistranslated"
>writings verses his sexual appetite and promiscuity!
>
>One last thing, ABSOLUTELY, THE ONLY REASON WHY YOU
>REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE TEACHINGS OF JESUS CHRIST BUT
>ACCEPT THOSE OF SAUL OF TARSUS OVER THOSE OF JESUS
>CHRIST
is because neither Jesus Christ or any of
>His bonafide ordained Apostles ever condemned
>homosexuality and if you believe in the teachings of
>Jesus Christ, you would have to condemn Saul of Tarsus
>as being as Jesus Christ said, "a liar of Satan and
>the antichrist!"
>
>
>David R.W. Wadsworth
>A Servant of the Most High and one True God
>
>El Santuario Escondido
>10387 Tioga Lake Drive
>Escondido, CA 92029-5405
>
>(760) 743-5293
>
>drww@home.com
>
>THE MILLENNIAL DISPENSATION
>
>http://members.home.net/drww/drww/david/
>
>
>NOTE: Amor gignit amorem (Love begats love). Remember,
>whether your God is an entity; a personage; a spirit;
>omniscient; omnipresent; objectivity, enlightenment,
>intelligence or a concept, God is Love and Satan is
>hate!
>
>Love and sex, while one can enhance the other, they
>mutually exclusive and come in a variety of forms and
>fashions, the beauty and morality of which depends
>upon its expression.
>
>Man can be assured his God was created in his own
>image when his God hates the same people he does.
>
>Is anyone so absolutely positive that their beliefs
>are in fact true, void of any clearly definable proof
>to the contrary, that after being able to exercise
>their God given right to freely make a choice, they
>would condemn someone else for making a different
>choice? Such is the Plan of Satan!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.