Date Posted:09:27:37 08/18/02 Sun Author: .Harlequin Subject: .another one? how about the jester. In reply to:
"[[ another jester? ]]" on 09:07:26 08/18/02 Sun
.[ooc: okies, lol. I have forsaken my html for now. too lazy, lol]
.and I hate smart alecks.
.you are dominent.
.i am dominent.
.I think we're gonna get along just fine.
..lucid optical receptors locate contour o' ungiligrade prescence; yet some how not the absent panjadrome. fibriance embelishes caraoace in alegro tempo, undulation confirm'd as harridian executes horizontal ellipsis 'round ungulate; phelegmatic traits unalter'd. context respir'd; concaves amplify ressecting the pungent biosphere to find its own in the stratusphere. sooty mitts excavate pliant topography, mild interest.
sans brevity
we would have no wit,
or so the saying goes
but i'm verbose,
and very glib
and now this rhyme i'll close.
] aurciular pinnae abstained from further dull wilting atop bleached acme. acerbic pararmour's interest arose dormant via ample voltage of enpshered pyrate, checked only through obsolete strategums. i think we'll get on nicely. [
] but i captiulate, brevity is the soul of wit; that's why this response is so concise. wouldn't want to contradict such a long-standing belief, now would i? naughty veneer adhered to cranil aur, like chalk to a chalkboard. some things just fit right. [
then i'd be a fool foolishly played by a fellow fool
